Botev, Jean ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Rodríguez Lera, Francisco J.; University of Léon
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Immersive Telepresence Framework for Remote Educational Scenarios
Publication date :
July 2020
Event name :
7th International Conference On Learning And Collaboration Technologies (LCT)
Event date :
from 19-07-2020 to 24-07-2020
Main work title :
Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International)
Adamides, G., Christou, G., Katsanos, C., Xenos, M., Hadzilacos, T.: Usability guidelines for the design of robot teleoperation: a taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 45(2), 256–262 (2015)
Baker, M., Casey, R., Keyes, B., Yanco, H.A.: Improved interfaces for human-robot interaction in urban search and rescue. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2004), pp. 2960–2965 (2004)
de Barros, P.G., Linderman, R.W.: A survey of user interfaces for robot teleoperation. Technical report, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2009). http://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/computerscience-pubs/21
Bartneck, C., Soucy, M., Fleuret, K., Sandoval, E.B.: The robot engine-making the unity 3D game engine work for HRI. In: Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2015), pp. 431–437 (2015)
Belpaeme, T., et al.: Child-robot interaction: perspectives and challenges. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds.) ICSR 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8239, pp. 452–459. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6 45
Belpaeme, T., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3(21) (2018)
Benyon, D.: Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design. Pearson Edinburgh (2014)
Cha, E., Chen, S., Matarić, M.J.: Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education. In: 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2017), pp. 683–688 (2017)
Clabaugh, C., Matarić, M.: Escaping Oz: autonomy in socially assistive robotics. Ann. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 2, 33–61 (2019)
Codd-Downey, R., Forooshani, P.M., Speers, A., Wang, H., Jenkin, M.R.M.: From ROS to unity: leveraging robot and virtual environment middleware for immersive teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA 2014), pp. 932–936 (2014)
Crooks, T.J.: The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Rev. Educ. Res. 58(4), 438–481 (1988)
Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Collaboration, dialogue, human-robot interaction. In: Jarvis, R.A., Zelinsky, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR 2003), pp. 255–266 (2003)
Gallon, L., Abenia, A., Dubergey, F., Négui, M.: Using a telepresence robot in an educational context. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS 2019), pp. 16–22 (2019)
Jecker, J.D., Maccoby, N., Breitrose, H.: Improving accuracy in interpreting nonverbal cues of comprehension. Psychol. Sch. 2(3), 239–244 (1965)
Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 21(4), 373–387 (2012)
Meng, W., Hu, Y., Lin, J., Lin, F., Teo, R.: ROS+Unity: an efficient high-fidelity 3D multi-UAV navigation and control simulator in GPS-denied environments. In: 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 2015), pp. 2562–2567 (2015)
Miller, D.P., Nourbakhsh, I.: Robotics for education. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 2115–2134. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1 79
Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., Dong, J.: A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technol. Educ. Learn. 1, 1–7 (2013)
Okon, J.: Role of non-verbal communication in education. Mediterranean J. Soc. Sci. 2(5), 35–40 (2011)
Pasternak, E., Fenichel, R., Marshall, A.N.: Tips for creating a block language with blockly. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B 2017), pp. 21–24 (2017)
Rodríguez-Lera, F.J., Matellán-Olivera, V., Conde-González, M.Á., Martín-Rico, F.: HiMoP: a three-component architecture to create more human-acceptable social-assistive robots. Cogn. Process. 19(2), 233–244 (2018)
Roldán, J.J., Peña-Tapia, E., Garzón-Ramos, D., de León, J., Garzón, M., del Cerro, J., Barrientos, A.: Multi-robot systems, virtual reality and ROS: developing a new generation of operator interfaces. In: Koubaa, A. (ed.) Robot Operating System (ROS). SCI, vol. 778, pp. 29–64. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91590-6 2
Schuemie, M.J., van der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., van der Mast, C.A.: Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. CyberPsychol. Behav. 4(2), 183–201 (2001)
Sita, E., Horváth, C.M., Thomessen, T., Korondi, P., Pipe, A.G.: ROS-Unity3D based system for monitoring of an industrial robotic process. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII 2017), pp. 1047–1052 (2017)
Toh, L.P.E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P.W., Chen, I.M., Yeo, S.H.: A review on the use of robots in education and young children. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(2), 148–163 (2016)
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., Verbeek, P.P.: Design for socially responsible behavior: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Des. Issues 27(3), 3–19 (2011)
Tsui, K.M., Desai, M., Yanco, H.A.: Considering the bystander’s perspective for indirect human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2010), pp. 129–130 (2010)
Tunstall, P., Gipps, C.: Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: a typology. Br. Educ. Res. J. 22(4), 389–404 (1996)
Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., Lankes, M., Tscheligi, M.: The USUS evaluation framework for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction at the Adaptive and Emergent Behaviour and Complex Systems Convention (AISB 2009), pp. 11–26 (2009)
Whitney, D., Rosen, E., Phillips, E., Konidaris, G., Tellex, S.: Comparing robot grasping teleoperation across desktop and virtual reality with ROS reality. In: Amato, N.M., Hager, G., Thomas, S., Torres-Torriti, M. (eds.) Robotics Research. SPAR, vol. 10, pp. 335–350. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4 28
Whitney, J.P., Chen, T., Mars, J., Hodgins, J.K.: A hybrid hydrostatic transmission and human-safe haptic telepresence robot. In: 22nd IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2016), pp. 690–695 (2016)
Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.: Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (ICSMC 2004), vol. 3, pp. 2841–2846 (2004)
Zhang, M., Duan, P., Zhang, Z., Esche, S.: Development of telepresence teaching robots with social capabilities. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE 2018), pp. 1–11 (2018)
