Huimin Dong and Olivier Roy. Dynamic logic of legal competences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, pages 1-24, 2021.
Frederic B. Fitch. A Revision of Hohfeld's Theory of Legal Concepts. Logique et Analyse, 10(39/40):269-276, December 1967.
G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, and E. Calardo. Possible world semantics for defeasible deontic logic. In T. Agotnes, J. Broersen, and D. Elgesem, editors, DEON, pages 46-60. Springer, 2012.
W.N. Hohfeld. Fundamental legal conceptions applied in judicial reasoning. In Fundamental Legal Conceptions Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays, pages 23-64. Yale, 1923.
Joris Hulstijn. Need to know: Questions and the paradox of epistemic obligation. In R. van der Meyden and L. van der Torre, editors, DEON 2008, volume 5076 of LNCS, pages 125-139. Springer, 2008.
D. Makinson and L van der Torre. Input/output logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 29(4):383-408, 2000.
David Makinson. On the formal representation of rights relations: Remarks on the work of Stig Kanger and Lars Lindahl. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15(4):403-425, November 1986.
Réka Markovich. Understanding Hohfeld and Formalizing Legal Rights: the Hohfeldian Conceptions and Their Conditional Consequences. Studia Logica, 108, 2020.
Réka Markovich and Olivier Roy. Formalizing the right to know: Epistemic rights as normative positions. In Logics for New-Generation AI, page 154, 2021.
Eric Pacuit. Neighborhood semantics for modal logic. Springer, 2017.
Marek Sergot. Normative positions. Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems, 1:353-406, 2013.
LaniWatson. The Right to Know: Epistemic Rights and Why We Need Them. Manuscript presented at the Edinburgh Legal Theory Group, 24 October 2019, 2019.
Lani Watson. The Right to Know. Epistemic Rights and Why We Need Them. Routledge, 2021.
