|
1.Friston, K.J., Statistical parametric mapping : the analysis of functional brain images. 2007, Burlington, M.A.: Academic. 2.McIntosh, A.R. and F. Gonzalez-Lima, Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 1994. 2(1-2): p. 2-22. 3.Bullmore, E., et al., How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? Neuroimage, 2000. 11(4): p. 289-301. 4.Friston, K.J., L. Harrison, and W. Penny, Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage, 2003. 19(4): p. 1273-1302. 5.Roebroeck, A., E. Formisano, and R. Goebel, The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage, 2009. In Press, Corrected Proof. 6.Granger, C.W.J., Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 1969. 37(3): p. 414-&. 7.Kayser, A.S., F.T. Sun, and M. D''Esposito, A Comparison of Granger Causality and Coherency in fMRI-Based Analysis of the Motor System. Human Brain Mapping, 2009. 30(11): p. 3475-3494. 8.Deshpande, G., et al., Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. 30(4): p. 1361-73. 9.Roebroeck, A., E. Formisano, and R. Goebel, Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage, 2005. 25(1): p. 230-42. 10.Goebel, R., et al., Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003. 21(10): p. 1251-1261. 11.Blinowska, K.J., R. Kus, and M. Kaminski, Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes. Physical Review E, 2004. 70(5): p. 4. 12.Korzeniewska, A., et al., Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2003. 125(1-2): p. 195-207. 13.Lin, F.H., et al., Dynamic Granger-Geweke Causality Modeling With Application to Interictal Spike Propagation. Human Brain Mapping, 2009. 30(6): p. 1877-1886. 14.Zhou, Z., et al., Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. 30(7): p. 2197-206. 15.Zhou, Z., et al., Detecting directional influence in fMRI connectivity analysis using PCA based Granger causality. Brain Res, 2009. 1289: p. 22-9. 16.Schreiber, T., Measuring information transfer. Physical Review Letters, 2000. 85(2): p. 461-464. 17.Shannon, C.E., A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948. 27(4): p. 623-656. 18.Paluš, M., et al., Synchronization and information flow in EEGs of epileptic patients. Ieee Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 2001. 20(5): p. 65-71. 19.Jin, S.H., P. Lin, and M. Hallett, Linear and nonlinear information flow based on time-delayed mutual information method and its application to corticomuscular interaction. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2010. 121(3): p. 392-401. 20.Vakorin, V.A., N. Kovacevic, and A.R. McIntosh, Exploring transient transfer entropy based on a group-wise ICA decomposition of EEG data. Neuroimage, 2010. 49(2): p. 1593-1600. 21.Hinrichs, H., H.J. Heinze, and M.A. Schoenfeld, Causal visual interactions as revealed by an information theoretic measure and fMRI. Neuroimage, 2006. 31(3): p. 1051-1060. 22.Hinrichs, H., T. Noesselt, and H.J. Heinze, Directed information flow - A model free measure to analyze causal interactions in event related EEG-MEG-Experiments. Human Brain Mapping, 2008. 29(2): p. 193-206. 23.Chavez, M., J. Martinerie, and M. Le Van Quyen, Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2003. 124(2): p. 113-128. 24.Theiler, J., et al., Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1992. 58(1-4): p. 77-94. 25.Lin, F.H., et al., Dynamic magnetic resonance inverse imaging of human brain function. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006. 56(4): p. 787-802. 26.Geweke, J., Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Multiple Time Series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1982. 77(378): p. 304-313. 27.Kirchgassner, G. and J. Wolters, Introduction to modern time series analysis. 2007, Berlin ; New York: Springer. ix, 274 p. 28.Schwarz, G., Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 1978. 6: p. 461-464. 29.Geweke, J.F., Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Time Series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1984. 79(388): p. 907-915. 30.Wikipedia. Nat (information) 30 September 2009 03:17 UTC 19 June 2010 15:04 UTC; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nat_(information)&oldid=317018269. 31.Fraser, A.M. and H.L. Swinney, Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Physical Review A, 1986. 33(2): p. 1134-1140. 32.Paluš, M. and M. Vejmelka, Directionality of coupling from bivariate time series: How to avoid false causalities and missed connections. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics), 2007. 75(5): p. 056211. 33.Barnett, L., A.B. Barrett, and A.K. Seth, Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy Are Equivalent for Gaussian Variables. Physical Review Letters, 2009. 103(23): p. 238701. 34.Small, M. and K. Judd, Detecting nonlinearity in experimental data. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 1998. 8(6): p. 1231-1244. 35.Schreiber, T. and A. Schmitz, Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physical Review Letters, 1996. 77(4): p. 635-638. 36.Dolan, K.T. and M.L. Spano, Surrogate for nonlinear time series analysis. Physical Review E, 2001. 64(4): p. 6. 37.Logothetis, N.K., et al., Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 2001. 412(6843): p. 150-157. 38.Pereda, E., R.Q. Quiroga, and J. Bhattacharya, Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Progress in Neurobiology, 2005. 77(1-2): p. 1-37. 39.Vazquez, A.L. and D.C. Noll, Nonlinear Aspects of the BOLD Response in Functional MRI. Neuroimage, 1998. 7(2): p. 108-118. 40.Chen, Y.H., et al., Analyzing multiple nonlinear time series with extended Granger causality. Physics Letters A, 2004. 324(1): p. 26-35. 41.Kraskov, A., H. Stogbauer, and P. Grassberger, Estimating mutual information. Physical Review E, 2004. 69(6): p. 16. 42.Silverman, B.W., Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. 1986, London ; New York: Chapman and Hall. 175 p.
|