Fodor on Causes of Mentalese Symbols

Date

2012-01-01

Author

AYTEKİN, TEVFİK
Sayan, Erdinc

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

115
views

0
downloads

Jerry Fodor's causal theory of content is a well-known naturalistic attempt purporting to show that Brentano was wrong in supposing that physical states cannot possess meaning and reference. Fodor's theory contains two crucial elements: one is a notion of "asymmetric dependence between nomic relations," and the other is an assumption about the nature of the "causally operative properties" involved in the causation of mental tokens. Having dealt elsewhere with the problems Fodor's notion of asymmetric dependence poses, we show in this paper a difficulty with the other element of his theory concerning what kinds of properties are the causally operative ones in the tokenings of a semantic symbol in the brain of a perceiver. After presenting this difficulty, we examine three possible responses a Fodorian might make to our criticism.

Subject Keywords

Causal theory of content, Naturalistic semantics, Asymmetric dependence, Causal law, Operative causes

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/66002

Journal

ORGANON F

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Misrepresentation and Robustness of Meaning AYTEKİN, TEVFİK; Sayan, Erdinc (2010-01-01) According to Fodor, robustness of meaning is an essential aspect of intentionality, and his causal theory of content can account for it. Robustness of meaning refers to the fact that tokenings; of a symbol are occasionally caused by instantiations of properties which are not expressed by the symbol. This, according to Fodor, is the source of the phenomenon of misrepresentation. We claim that Fodor's treatment of content and misrepresentation is infected with a couple of flaws. After criticizing Fodor's theo...
Mathematical ontology the question of the mathematical source of objectivity Dorrikhteh, Omid; Grünberg, David; Department of Philosophy (2019) This thesis traces the source of mathematical objectivity, as an approach to justify mathematical properties to be real, through how our mind and language were evolved. In the mirror of the indispensability argument, and the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics, it will be argued that the reason why the world and the mind exhibit ontologically similar structures (and properties) is because they have the same ontological origin. Accordingly, it will be shown that (1) why/how that “the world and the mind...
A Search for the foundations of natural law Tunçay, Serkan; Ergüden, Akın; Department of Philosophy (2002) The present thesis analyzes the relationship between law and morality in a historical context and will attempt to present that there is a necessary connection between two spheres. Historical developments of the idea of natural law will be traced in the first three chapters of the thesis in order to present the necessary relationship between the sphere of legality and that of morality. In the fourth chapter the arguments of positivist theories against to natural law theory will be discussed. In the last chap...
A Study of argumentation in Turkish within a Bayesian reasoning framework : arguments from ignorance Karaaslan, Hatice; Hohenberger, Annette Edeltraud; Demir, Mehmet Hilmi; Department of Cognitive Sciences (2012) In this dissertation, a normative prescriptive paradigm, namely a Bayesian theory of content-dependent argument strength, was employed in order to investigate argumentation, specifically the classic fallacy of the “argument from ignorance” or “argumentum ad ignorantiam”. The study was carried out in Turkish with Turkish participants. In the Bayesian framework, argument strength is determined by the interactions between three major factors: prior belief, polarity, and evidence reliability. In addition, topic...
Some set-theoretical traces in Leibniz's works Ertemiz, Nusret; Grünberg, David; Department of Philosophy (2010) The purpose of this dissertation is to search the primitives of Axiomatic Set Theory in Leibnizian Philolosophy, nourishing, roughly, from Platonic idea of universal-particular distinction, Aristotelian syllogistic propositions of Organon-Categoria and Euclidean Methodology in Elements. The main focus of the dissertation intends to examine the analyticity of Leibnizian Metaphysics and the anologies between the subject-predicate relation in The Philosophy of Leibniz and Axiomatic Method in general and Set Th...

Citation Formats

T. AYTEKİN and E. Sayan, “Fodor on Causes of Mentalese Symbols,” ORGANON F, pp. 3–15, 2012, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/66002.