English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Detecting the Direction of Causal Time Series

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84134

Peters,  J
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons75626

Janzing,  D
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83946

Gretton,  A
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84193

Schölkopf,  B
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Peters, J., Janzing, D., Gretton, A., & Schölkopf, B. (2009). Detecting the Direction of Causal Time Series. In A. Danyluk, L. Bottou, & M. Danyluk (Eds.), ICML '09: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 801-808). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C477-C
Abstract
We propose a method that detects the true
direction of time series, by fitting an autoregressive
moving average model to the data.
Whenever the noise is independent of the previous
samples for one ordering of the observations,
but dependent for the opposite ordering,
we infer the former direction to be the
true one. We prove that our method works
in the population case as long as the noise of
the process is not normally distributed (for
the latter case, the direction is not identificable).
A new and important implication of
our result is that it confirms a fundamental
conjecture in causal reasoning - if after regression
the noise is independent of signal for
one direction and dependent for the other,
then the former represents the true causal
direction - in the case of time series. We
test our approach on two types of data: simulated
data sets conforming to our modeling
assumptions, and real world EEG time series.
Our method makes a decision for a significant
fraction of both data sets, and these
decisions are mostly correct. For real world
data, our approach outperforms alternative
solutions to the problem of time direction recovery.