Realism About Tense and Perspective
Author(s)
Hare, Caspar
DownloadCJHarePerspectivalRealism.pdf (109.8Kb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
On one view of time (a view that has gone by the names of tense realism, eternalist A‐theory, hyper‐kenesis, and the moving spotlight view) past, present and future things exist, but their being past, present or future does not consist in their standing in before‐ and after‐relations to other things. So, for example, the event of the signing of the Magna Carta is past, and its being so does not consist in, or reduce to, its coming before the events of 2010.
In this paper I discuss arguments for and against this view and view in its near vicinity, perspectival realism. I suggest that perspectival realism is a better view than tense realism. It shares the principal virtues, but not the principal vices, of tense realism.
Citing Literature
Date issued
2010-09Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Philosophy Compass
Publisher
Wiley Blackwell
Citation
Hare, Caspar. “Realism About Tense and Perspective.” Philosophy Compass 5, 9 (September 2010): 760–769 © 2010 The Author
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
1747-9991