Does more choice equal a better choice? Courtship behavior, mating propensity and female fitness in relation to the number and density of potential partners

Date
2007
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Description
Abstract

The good genes hypothesis predicts that females discriminate among potential mates on the basis of their genetic quality. We measured the indirect benefits received by females with different levels of choice---from no choice to choosing among 5 males---in the housefly, Musca domestica , at high and low density. Secondly, we tested how the degree of choice affected the courtship behavior of both sexes and whether this behavior was correlated to female reproductive success. Opportunity for choice did not affect mating propensity or offspring survivorship, but did affect male courtship rate and the number of eggs females laid in their first clutch. Females at low density were more likely to mate, laid more eggs in their first clutches, and had greater egg-to-adult viability than females mated at high density. Overall, the degree of choice affected some aspects of mating behavior and fitness, but the effects were primarily density dependent.

Description
Degree
Master of Science
Type
Thesis
Keywords
Ecology
Citation

Carrillo, Juli Ann. "Does more choice equal a better choice? Courtship behavior, mating propensity and female fitness in relation to the number and density of potential partners." (2007) Master’s Thesis, Rice University. https://hdl.handle.net/1911/20496.

Has part(s)
Forms part of
Published Version
Rights
Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
Link to license
Citable link to this page