Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/34709
Title: | Central adjudication of serious adverse events did not affect trial's safety results: Data from the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) trial. | |
Authors: | ||
Mesh: | ||
Issue Date: | 2018 | |
Citation: | PLoS ONE.2018;(13)11:e0208142 | |
Abstract: | Central adjudication of serious adverse events (SAEs) can be undertaken in clinical trials, especially for open-label studies where outcome assessment may be at risk of bias. This study explored the effect of central adjudication of SAEs on the safety results of the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) Trial. | |
PMID: | 30475912 | |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/34709 | |
Rights: | openAccess | |
Appears in Collections: | Fundaciones e Institutos de Investigación > IIS H. U. La Paz > Artículos Hospitales > H. U. La Paz > Artículos | |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PMC6258247.pdf | 528.83 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.