Mandel Th, Frischholz M, Heibig R, Birkle S and Hammerschmidt A 1993 Appl. Surf. Sci. 65/66 784
Wang W N, Fox N A, Richardson D, Lynch G M and Steeds J W 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 1505
Amaratunga G, Segal D and Mckenzie D R 1991 Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 69
Konofaos N and Thomas C B 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 6238
Margaritondo G and Capasso F (eds) 1987 Heterojunctions Band Discontinuities-Physics Device Applications (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
Robertson J 1987 J. Non-Ciyst. Sollte 97/98 863
Sebastiani M, DiGaspare L, Capellini G, Bittencourt C and Evangelisti F 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3352
Brown T M, Bittencourt C, Sebastiani M and Evangelisti F 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 9904
Kusmoki I and Igari Y 1992 Appl. Surf. Sci. 59 95
Bittencourt C, De Seta M and Evangelisti F 1998 J Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16 1599
Bittencourt C 1998 J. Phys.: Condera. Matter submitted
Robertson J 1991 Prog. Solid State Chem. 21 199
Robertson J and O'Reilly E P 1987 Phys. Rev. B 35 2946
In the context of this work, a thick overlayer means that the thickness is such that only the electrons generated on the film contribute to the LEYS-CFS spectrum. Since the escape depth of the electrons generated at the low energies used is nearly 40 Å, a thick overlayer is one with thickness greater than 40 A, In contrast a thin layer is one which permits the contribution of the electrons generated in both sides of a heterojunction to the LEYS-CFS spectra. In this case an optimal layer thickness is around 15 A.
Harrison W A 1985 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3 1231
Tersoff J 1984 Phys. Rev. B 30 4874
Tersoff J 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 2755
List R S and Spicer W E 1988 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6 1228
