Full Text

• Dehon G., Bogaerts P., Duez P., Catoire L., and Dubois J. Curve fitting of combined comet intensity profiles: a new global concept to quantify DNA damage by the comet assay. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 73 (2004) 235-243
• Tice R.R., Agurell E., Anderson D., Burlinson B., Hartmann A., Kobayashi H., Miyamae Y., Rojas E., Ryu J., and Sasaki Y.F. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. (2000) 206-221
• Fairbairn D.W., Olive P.L., and O'Neill K.L. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat. Res. 339 (1995) 37-59
• Olive P.L. DNA damage and repair in individual cells: applications of the comet assay in radiobiology. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 75 (1999) 395-405
• Rojas E., Lopez M.C., and Valverde M. Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: methodology and applications. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Appl. 722 (1999) 225-254
• Collins A.R. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol. Biotechnol. 26 (2004) 249-261
• Hartmann A., Agurell E., Beeyers C., Brendler-Schwaab S., Burlinson B., Clay P., Collins A., Smith A., Speit G., Thybaud V., and Tice R. Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. Mutagenesis 18 (2003) 45-51
• Gedik C.M., Ewen S.W., and Collins A.R. Single-cell gel electrophoresis applied to the analysis of UV-C damage and its repair in human cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 62 (1992) 313-320
• Anderson D., Yu T.W., Phillips B.J., and Schmezer P. The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen- radical-generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the COMET assay. Mutat. Res. 307 (1994) 261-271
• Collins A.R., Ma A.G., and Duthie S.J. The kinetics of repair of oxidative DNA damage (strand breaks and oxidised pyrimidines) in human cells. Mutat. Res. 336 (1995) 69-77
• Kobayashi H., Sugiyama C., Morikawa Y., Hayashi M., and Sofuni T. A comparison between manual microscopic analysis and computerized image analysis in the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. MMS Commun. 3 (1995) 103-115
• Avishai N., Rabinowitz C., and Rinkevich B. Use of the comet assay for studying environmental genotoxicity: comparisons between visual and image analyses. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 42 (2003) 155-165
• McCarthy P.J., Sweetman S.F., McKenna P.G., and McKelvey-Martin V.J. Evaluation of manual and image analysis quantification of DNA damage in the alkaline comet assay. Mutagenesis 12 (1997) 209-214
• http://www.cometassay.com.
• Helma C., and Uhl M. A public domain image-analysis program for the single-cell gel- electrophoresis (comet) assay. Mutat. Res. 466 (2000) 9-15
• Konca K., Lankoff A., Banasik A., Lisowska H., Kuszewski T., Gozdz S., Koza Z., and Wojcik A. A cross-platform public domain PC image-analysis program for the comet assay. Mutat. Res. 534 (2003) 15-20
• Olive P.L., Banath J.P., and Durand R.E. Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the "comet" assay. Radiat. Res. 122 (1990) 86-94
• Collins A., Dusinská M., Franklin M., Somorovská M., Petrovská H., Duthie S., Fillion L., Panayiotidis M., Raslová K., and Vaughan N. Comet assay in human biomonitoring studies: reliability, validation, and applications. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 30 (1997) 139-146
• O'Neill K.L., Fairbairn D.W., and Standing M.D. Analysis of single-cell gel electrophoresis using laser-scanning microscopy. Mutat. Res. 319 (1993) 129-134
• Hellman B., Vaghef H., and Boström B. The concepts of tail moment and tail inertia in the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat. Res. 336 (1995) 123-131
• Kent C.R., Eady J.J., Ross G.M., and Steel G.G. The comet moment as a measure of DNA damage in the comet assay. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 67 (1995) 655-660
• Bocker W., Bauch T., Muller W.U., and Streffer C. Image analysis of comet assay measurements. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 72 (1997) 449-460
• Petersen A.B., Gniadecki R., and Wulf H.C. Laser scanning cytometry for comet assay analysis. Cytometry 39 (2000) 10-15
• Baert P., and Van Oostveldt P. Miniaturizing the comet assay with 3D vertical comets. Cytometry 51A (2003) 26-34
• Bowden R.D., Buckwalter M.R., McBride J.F., Johnson D.A., Murray B.K., and O'Neill K.L. Tail profile: a more accurate system for analyzing DNA damage using the Comet assay. Mutat. Res. 537 (2003) 1-9
• Hartmann A., Schumacher M., Plappert-Helbig U., Lowe P., Suter W., and Mueller L. Use of the alkaline in vivo Comet assay for mechanistic genotoxicity investigations. Mutagenesis 19 (2004) 51-59
• Hartmann A., Elhajouji A., Kiskinis E., Poetter F., Martus H., Fjallman A., Frieauff W., and Suter W. Use of the alkaline comet assay for industrial genotoxicity screening: comparative investigation with the micronucleus test. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 39 (2001) 843-858
• Kiskinis E., Suter W., and Hartmann A. High throughput Comet assay using 96-well plates. Mutagenesis 17 (2002) 37-43
• Hartmann A., Plappert U., Poetter F., and Suter W. Comparative study with the alkaline Comet assay and the chromosome aberration test. Mutat. Res. 536 (2003) 27-38
• Frieauff W., Hartmann A., and Suter W. Automatic analysis of slides processed in the Comet assay. Mutagenesis 16 (2001) 133-137
• Wiklund S.J., and Agurell E. Aspects of design and statistical analysis in the Comet assay. Mutagenesis 18 (2003) 167-175
• Bocker W., Rolf W., Bauch T., Muller W.U., and Streffer C. Automated comet assay analysis. Cytometry 35 (1999) 134-144
• McNamee J.P., McLean J.R., Ferrarotto C.L., and Bellier P.V. Comet assay: rapid processing of multiple samples. Mutat. Res. 466 (2000) 63-69
• Schunck C., Johannes T., Varga D., Lorch T., and Plesch A. New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 104 (2004) 383-389
• Duez P., Dehon G., Kumps A., and Dubois J. Statistics of the Comet assay: a key to discriminate between genotoxic effects. Mutagenesis 18 (2003) 159-166
• Ejchart A., and Sadlej-Sosnowska N. Statistical evaluation and comparison of comet assay results. Mutat. Res. 534 (2003) 85-92
• Lovell D.P., Thomas G., and Dunbow R. Issues related to the experimental design and subsequent statistical analysis of in vivo and in vitro comet studies. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen. 19 (1999) 109-119
• Singh N.P., McCoy M.T., Tice R.R., and Schneider E.L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 175 (1988) 184-191
• Klaude M., Eriksson S., Nygren J., and Ahnstrom G. The comet assay: mechanisms and technical considerations. Mutat. Res. 363 (1996) 89-96
• Ashby J., Tinwell H., Lefevre P.A., and Browne M.A. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay for induced DNA damage (comet assay): measurement of tail length and moment. Mutagenesis 10 (1995) 85-90
• Stockl D., Dewitte K., and Thienpont L.M. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?. Clin. Chem. 44 (1998) 2340-2346
• Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
• Westgard J.O. Points of care in using statistics in method comparison studies. Clin. Chem. 44 (1998) 2240-2242
• Linnet K. Estimation of the linear relationship between the measurements of two methods with proportional errors. Stat. Med. 9 (1990) 1463-1473
• Linnet K. Performance of Deming regression analysis in case of misspecified analytical error ratio in method comparison studies. Clin. Chem. 44 (1998) 1024-1031
• Marquis P. Comparaisons de méthodes analytiques. Ann. Biol. Clin. 57 (1999) 737-738