CIPSE - Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en Psychophysiologie et Electrophysiologie de la cognition CREMH - Mind & Health
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Miceli, Aurélie ; Université de Mons > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie
Wauthia, Erika ; Université de Mons > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie
Lefebvre, Laurent ; Université de Mons > Unités externes > Ganved ASBL ; Université de Mons > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie
Ris, Laurence ; Université de Mons > Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie > Service de Neurosciences
Simoes Loureiro, Isabelle ; Université de Mons > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie
Language :
English
Title :
Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.
Publication date :
14 June 2021
Journal title :
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., Switzerland
Volume :
12
Issue :
June 2021
Pages :
1-14
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Research unit :
P325 - Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie
Research institute :
R350 - Institut de recherche en sciences et technologies du langage R550 - Institut des Sciences et Technologies de la Santé
Alario F.-X., Ferrand L., Laganaro M., New B., Frauenfelder U. H., Segui J., (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 140–155. doi: 10.3758/BF03195559, PMID: 15190709
Barsalou L. W., (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149, PMID: 11301525
Barsalou L. W., (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639, PMID: 17705682
Beck A. T., Steer R. A., Brown G., (1996). Beck depression inventory–II. Psychological Assessment.
Binder J. R., (2016). In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23, 1096–1108. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0909-1, PMID: 27294428
Binder J. R., Westbury C. F., McKiernan K. A., Possing E. T., Medler D. A., (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 905–917. doi: 10.1162/0898929054021102, PMID: 16021798
Bonin P., (2007). Psychologie du Langage. Approche Cognitive de la Production Verbale de Mots. Bruxelles: DeBoeck.
Bonin P., Méot A., Aubert L.-F., Malardier N., Niedenthal P., Capelle-Toczek M.-C., (2003a). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d’imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots. Annee Psychol. 103, 655–694. doi: 10.3406/psy.2003.29658
Bonin P., Méot A., Ferrand L., Bugaïska A., (2015). Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and visual word recognition. Behav. Res. Methods 47, 813–825. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0503-x, PMID: 24993636
Bonin P., Méot A., Ferrand L., Roux S., (2011). Imageability: norms and relationships with other psycholinguistic variables. The Psychological year. 111, 327–357., PMID: 24993636
Bonin P., Peereman R., Malardier N., Méot A., Chalard M., (2003b). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 35, 158–167. doi: 10.3758/bf03195507, PMID: 12723790
Chedid G., Brambati S. M., Bedetti C., Rey A. E., Wilson M. A., Vallet G. T., (2019a). Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 2094–2105. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01254-w, PMID: 31016685
Chedid G., Wilson M. A., Bedetti C., Rey A. E., Vallet G. T., Brambati S. M., (2019b). Norms of conceptual familiarity for 3,596 French nouns and their contribution in lexical decision. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 2238–2247. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1106-8, PMID: 30128888
Chen I. H., Zhao Q., Long Y., Lu Q., Huang C. R., (2019). Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms. PLoS One 14:e0227202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227202, PMID: 31891643
Collins A. M., Loftus E. F., (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 82:407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
Connell L., Lynott D., (2010). Look but don’t touch: tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific words. Cognition 115, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.005, PMID: 19903564
Connell L., Lynott D., (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition 125, 452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010, PMID: 22935248
Connell L., Lynott D., (2014). Principles of representation: why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6, 390–406. doi: 10.1111/tops.12097, PMID: 24895329
Connell L., Lynott D., (2016). Do we know what we’re simulating? Information loss on transferring unconscious perceptual simulation to conscious imagery. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 42:1218. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000245, PMID: 26866656
Connell L., Lynott D., Banks B., (2018). Interoception: the forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373:20170143. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0143, PMID: 29915011
Craig A. D., (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 655–666. doi: 10.1038/nrn894, PMID: 12154366
Craig A. D., Craig A., (2009). How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70. doi: 10.1038/nrn2555, PMID: 19096369
Critchley H. D., Harrison N. A., (2013). Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron. 77, 624–638. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.008, PMID: 19096369
de Araujo I., Rolls E. T., Kringelbach M. L., McGlone F., Phillips N., (2003). Taste-olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 2059–2068. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02915.x, PMID: 14622239
de Groot A. M., (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15:824. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.824
Delwiche J. F., Heffelfinger A. L., (2005). Cross-modal additivity of taste and smell. J. Sens. Stud. 20, 512–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2005.00047.x
Đurđević D. F., Popović Stijačić M., Karapandžić J., (2016). “A quest for sources of perceptual richness: several candidates,” in Studies in Language and Mind. eds. S. Halupka-Rešetar and S. Martínez-Ferreiro (RS, Novi Sad: Faculty of Philosophy in Novi), 187–238.
Farah M. J., McClelland J. L., (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 120:339. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.339, PMID: 1837294
Fernandino L., Binder J. R., Desai R. H., Pendl S. L., Humphries C. J., Gross W. L., et al. (2016). Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: a framework for embodied semantics. Cereb. Cortex 26, 2018–2034. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv020, PMID: 25750259
Ferrand L., Bonin P., Méot A., Augustinova M., New B., Pallier C., et al. (2008). Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 1049–1054. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1049, PMID: 19001395
Fodor J. A., (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT press.
González J., Barros-Loscertales A., Pulvermüller F., Meseguer V., Sanjuán A., Belloch V., et al. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage 32, 906–912. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.037, PMID: 16651007
Hargreaves I. S., Pexman P. M., Johnson J. S., Zdrazilova L., (2012). Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:73. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00073, PMID: 22514526
Harshaw C., (2015). Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression. Psychol. Bull. 141:311. doi: 10.1037/a0038101, PMID: 25365763
Juhasz B. J., Yap M. J., (2013). Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono-and disyllabic words. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 160–168. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0242-9, PMID: 22936106
Juhasz B. J., Yap M. J., Dicke J., Taylor S. C., Gullick M. M., (2011). Tangible words are recognized faster: the grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1683–1691. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605150, PMID: 21892884
Kaiser H. F., (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
Khalsa S. S., Lapidus R. C., (2016). Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Front. Psychiatry 7:121., PMID: 19363198
Kiefer M., Sim E.-J., Herrnberger B., Grothe J., Hoenig K., (2008). The sound of concepts: four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. J. Neurosci. 28, 12224–12230. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3579-08.2008, PMID: 19020016
Kuperman V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez H., Brysbaert M., (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behav. Res. Methods 44, 978–990. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4, PMID: 22581493
Lynott D., Connell L., (2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 516–526. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0, PMID: 23055172
Lynott D., Connell L., Brysbaert M., Brand J., Carney J., (2019). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 1271–1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z, PMID: 31832879
Marques J. F., (2006). Specialization and semantic organization: evidence for multiple semantics linked to sensory modalities. Mem. Cogn. 34, 60–67. doi: 10.3758/BF03193386, PMID: 16686106
Martin A., (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 25–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143, PMID: 16968210
McRae K., De Sa V. R., Seidenberg M. S., (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 126:99. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.99, PMID: 9163932
Mehling W. E., Price C., Daubenmier J. J., Acree M., Bartmess E., Stewart A., (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS One 7:e48230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048230, PMID: 23133619
Miklashevsky A., (2018). Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, imageability and other variables. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 47, 641–661. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1, PMID: 29282595
Mojet J., Köster E., Prinz J., (2005). Do tastants have a smell? Chem. Senses 30, 9–21. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh251, PMID: 15647460
Morucci P., Bottini R., Crepaldi D., (2019). Augmented modality exclusivity norms for concrete and abstract Italian property words. J. Cogn. 2:42. doi: 10.5334/joc.88, PMID: 31709385
Murphy G. L., (2002). The Big Book of Concepts (A Bradford Book). Cambridge: MIT press.
New B., Brysbaert M., Veronis J., Pallier C., (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Appl. Psycholinguist. 28, 661–677. doi: 10.1017/S014271640707035X
Newcombe P. I., Campbell C., Siakaluk P. D., Pexman P. M., (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275, PMID: 23060778
Paivio A., (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 76:241. doi: 10.1037/h0027272
Paivio A., (1991). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Can. J. Psychol. 45, 255–287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295
Patterson K., Nestor P. J., Rogers T. T., (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 976–987. doi: 10.1038/nrn2277, PMID: 18026167
Paulus M. P., Stein M. B., (2010). Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 451–463. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0258-9, PMID: 20490545
Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L. W., (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychol. Sci. 14, 119–124. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429, PMID: 12661672
Pexman P. M., (2019). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 34, 1274–1283. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1303522
Quillian M. R., (1967). Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behav. Sci. 12, 410–430. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830120511, PMID: 6059773
Rogers T. T., Hocking J., Noppeney U., Mechelli A., Gorno-Tempini M. L., Patterson K., et al. (2006). Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory: reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 201–213. doi: 10.3758/CABN.6.3.201, PMID: 17243356
Rolls E., (2008). Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiol. Hung. 95, 131–164. doi: 10.1556/APhysiol.95.2008.2.1, PMID: 18642756
Rubin D. C., (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: a unit analysis of verbal behavior. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19, 736–755. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90415-6
Schandry R., (1981). Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 18, 483–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02486.x, PMID: 7267933
Simmons W. K., Ramjee V., Beauchamp M. S., McRae K., Martin A., Barsalou L. W., (2007). A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color. Neuropsychologia 45, 2802–2810. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.002, PMID: 17575989
Sirois M., Kremin H., Cohen H., (2006). Picture-naming norms for Canadian French: Name agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, and age of acquisition. Behav. Res. Methods. 38, 300–306. doi: 10.3758/BF03192781, PMID: 11757881
Speed L. J., Brysbaert M., (2020). Dutch Sensory Modality Norms. PsyArXiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/zv6pn
Speed L. J., Majid A., (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: simulating perceptual modality in space. Behav. Res. Methods 49, 2204–2218. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3, PMID: 28155185
Spence C., Shore D. I., Klein R. M., (2001). Multisensory prior entry. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 799–832. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.799, PMID: 11757881
Spielberger C. D., Gorsuch R. L., Lushene R., Vagg P. R., Jacobs G. A., (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
Thompson-Schill S. L., (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where”. Neuropsychologia 41, 280–292. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00161-6, PMID: 12457754
Turatto M., Galfano G., Bridgeman B., Umiltà C., (2004). Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Exp. Brain Res. 155, 301–310. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x, PMID: 14658019
Tyler L. K., Moss H. E., (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 244–252. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01651-X, PMID: 11390295
Van Dantzig S., Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L. W., (2008). Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cogn. Sci. 32, 579–590. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035365, PMID: 21635347
van Dantzig S., Cowell R. A., Zeelenberg R., Pecher D., (2011). A sharp image or a sharp knife: Norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items. Behav. Res. Methods 43, 145–154., PMID: 21635347
Vergallito A., Petilli M. A., Marelli M., (2020). Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 1599–1616. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8, PMID: 31950360
Vermeulen N., Niedenthal P. M., Luminet O., (2007). Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs. Cogn. Sci. 31, 183–192. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336990, PMID: 21635293
Vigliocco G., Vinson D. P., Lewis W., Garrett M. F., (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cogn. Psychol. 48, 422–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001, PMID: 15099798
Wilson M., (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322, PMID: 12613670
Winter B., (2016). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 31, 975–988. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1193619
Yap M. J., Pexman P. M., Wellsby M., Hargreaves I. S., Huff M., (2012). An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072, PMID: 22529787
