Agri-environment scheme; Field margin; Seed mix; Set-aside; Wildflower; Ecology; Animal Science and Zoology; Agronomy and Crop Science
Abstract :
[en] Floral abundance and richness on farmland has been declining since the mid 1900 s. Agri-environment schemes (AES) can improve floral resource availability through establishment of flower-rich areas or careful management of areas set-aside to naturally regenerate on farmland. Ideal management regimes include sowing and re-sowing of seed mixes, regular cuts of growth, and removal of cuttings to optimise floral diversity. Our aim was to determine which areas and managements on farmland provided greatest floral resources for insect pollinators, and if these persisted over time. We surveyed 67 non-crop areas across eight farms in the south of England during 2014 and again in 2018, recording each flowering species present and the estimated floral abundance of each species. We then interviewed the farmers to determine management details and history for each surveyed area. Our results showed that floral abundance was initially greatest in sown Pollen & Nectar Strips and Florally Enhanced (FE) Grass Margins, but subsequently declined: from 1 to 5 years to 6–10 years for Pollen & Nectar Strips, and from 1 to 10 years to 11–20 years for FE Grass Margins. Additionally, only a handful of sown species known to be beneficial for insect pollinators persisted over time: Centaurea nigra, Lotus corniculatus, Trifolium pratense and Leucanthemum vulgare. It is vital that policy makers move forward with pollinator-targeting AES that can successfully support a variety of insects, including both pollinators and crop-pest predators. Species lists for AES seed mixes should include higher proportions of persistent perennial species, and a better support structure is needed in order to aid farmers with AES managements.
Disciplines :
Zoology
Author, co-author :
Nichols, R.N.; School of Life Sciences, John Maynard Smith (JMS) Building, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust Natural Environment Research Council
Funding text :
We would like to thank all farmers/land managers for allowing us access to their land to conduct the surveys, and for giving up their time in order for us to conduct detailed interviews regarding their land management practices. This work was supported by NERC , UK grants for R.N.N [ NE/P009972/1 ] and T.J.W [ NE/J016802/1 ], and by The Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust , UK.
Alison, J., et al. Successful restoration of moth abundance and species-richness in grassland created under agri-environment schemes. Biol. Conserv., 2017, 51–58, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.003.
Anderson, M.J., 2004. PERMDISP: A FORTRAN Computer Program for Permutational Analysis of Multivariate Dispersions (for Any Two-factor ANOVA design) Using Permutation Tests. University of Auckland, New Zealand: Department of Statistics.
Assis, J., et al. Performing fish counts with a wide-angle camera, a promising approach reducing divers’ limitations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 445 (2013), 93–98, 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.04.007.
Barr, C.J., et al., 1990. Countryside Survey 1990 Main Report. London, UK.
Barral, M.P., et al. Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2015, 223–231, 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009.
Barraud, A., et al., 2022. Variations in nutritional requirements across bee species. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., p. 6. 〈DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.824750〉.
Bates, D., et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67:1 (2015), 1–48, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Carvell, C., et al. Assessing the value of annual and perennial forage mixtures for bumblebees by direct observation and pollen analysis. Apidologie, 2006, 326–340, 10.1051/apido:2006002.
Carvell, C., et al. Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins. J. Appl. Ecol., 2007, 29–40, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01249.x.
Chaudron, C., et al. An agro-environmental mowing regime favors the number of inflorescences and flower-visiting insects but not ground beetles of herbaceous boundaries of arable fields. Basic Appl. Ecol., 2020, 1–10, 10.1016/j.baae.2020.06.002.
DEFRA, 2005. Entry Level Stewardship Handbook. Available at: 〈 www.defra.gov.uk〉. (Accessed 14 December 2020).
DEFRA, 2018. The Guide to Cross Compliance In England 2018. Available at: 〈 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/668684/Cross_Compliance_2018_guide_v1.0.pdf〉. (Accessed 19 November 2018).
Dicks, L.V., et al. How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge. Ecol. Entomol., 2015, 22–35, 10.1111/een.12226.
Falk, S.J., Lewington, R., Field Guide to the Bees of Great Britain and Ireland. 2015, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, First. London.
Foley, J.A., et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 570–574, 10.1126/science.1111772.
Foley, J.A., et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:7369 (2011), 337–342, 10.1038/nature10452.
Gossner, M.M., et al. Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities. Nature, 2016, 266–269, 10.1038/nature20575.
Gresty, C.E.A., et al. Flower preferences and pollen transport networks for cavity-nesting solitary bees: implications for the design of agri-environment schemes. Ecol. Evol., 2018, 10.1002/ece3.4234.
Habel, J.C., et al. Long-term large-scale decline in relative abundances of butterfly and burnet moth species across south-western Germany. Sci. Rep., 2019, 10.1038/s41598-019-51424-1.
Hallmann, C.A., et al. Insect biomass decline scaled to species diversity: general patterns derived from a hoverfly community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118(2), 2021, 10.1073/pnas.2002554117/-/DCSupplemental.y.
Heard, M.S., et al. Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes. Biol. Lett. 3:6 (2007), 638–641, 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0425.
Hicks, D.M., et al. Food for pollinators: quantifying the nectar and pollen resources of urban flower meadows. PLOS ONE, 2016, 10.1371/journal.pone.0158117.
Hudewenz, A., et al. Herbivore and pollinator responses to grassland management intensity along experimental changes in plant species richness. Biol. Conserv. 150:1 (2012), 42–52, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.024.
Klein, A.M., et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 2007, 303–313, 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
Lockhart, J.A.R., Samuel, A., Greaves, M.P., The evolution of weed control in British agriculture. Hance, R.J., Holly, K., (eds.) Weed Control Handbook: Principles, eighth ed., 1990, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 43–74.
Loos, J., et al. Local and landscape responses of biodiversity in calcareous grasslands. Biodivers. Conserv., 2021, 2415–2432, 10.1007/s10531-021-02201-y.
Marja, R., et al. Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources. J. Appl. Ecol., 2018, 10.1111/1365-2664.13119.
McCracken, M.E., et al. Social and ecological drivers of success in agri-environment schemes: the roles of farmers and environmental context. J. Appl. Ecol. 52:3 (2015), 696–705, 10.1111/1365-2664.12412.
McHugh, N.M., et al. The value of two agri-environment scheme habitats for pollinators: annually cultivated margins for arable plants and floristically enhanced grass margins. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2022, 326, 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107773.
Meyer, S., et al. Promoting diverse communities of wild bees and hoverflies requires a landscape approach to managing meadows. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2017, 376–384, 10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.037.
Nichols, R.N., Goulson, D., Holland, J.M., The best wildflowers for wild bees. J. Insect Conserv., 2019, 819–830, 10.1007/s10841-019-00180-8.
Nichols, R.N., Holland, J.M., Goulson, D., Can novel seed mixes provide a more diverse, abundant, earlier, and longer-lasting floral resource for bees than current mixes?. Basic Appl. Ecol., 2022, 34–47, 10.1016/j.baae.2022.02.002.
Noordijk, J., et al. Optimizing grassland management for flower-visiting insects in roadside verges. Biol. Conserv. 142:10 (2009), 2097–2103, 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.009.
Nowakowski, M., Pywell, R., Habitat Creation and Management for Pollinators. 2016, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Oksanen, J., et al., 2020. Package “vegan”.
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., Tarrant, S., How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?. Oikos 120:3 (2011), 321–326, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
Ouvrard, P., Transon, J., Jacquemart, A.-L., Flower-strip agri-environment schemes provide diverse and valuable summer flower resources for pollinating insects. Biodivers. Conserv., 2018, 1–24, 10.1007/s10531-018-1531-0.
Piqueray, J., et al. Management of grassland-like wildflower strips sown on nutrient-rich arable soils: the role of grass density and mowing regime. Environ. Manag., 2019, 647–657, 10.1007/s00267-019-01153-y.
Potts, S.G., et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2010, 345–353, 10.1016/J.TREE.2010.01.007.
Potts, S.G., et al., 2007. Experiment 2 – Management of the Non-cropped Margin Structure to Maximise Biodiversity. The SAFFIE Project Report. Boxworth, UK: The SAFFIE Project Report, ADAS, pp. 268–523.
Powney, G.D., et al. Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9.
Pywell, R.F., Meek, W.R., Loxton, R.G., et al. Ecological restoration on farmland can drive beneficial functional responses in plant and invertebrate communities. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2011, 62–67, 10.1016/J.AGEE.2010.11.012.
Pywell, R.F., Meek, W.R., Hulmes, L., et al. Management to enhance pollen and nectar resources for bumblebees and butterflies within intensively farmed landscapes. J. Insect Conserv. 15:6 (2011), 853–864, 10.1007/s10841-011-9383-x.
R Core Team, 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 〈 https://www.R-project.org/〉.
Robinson, R.A., Sutherland, W.J., Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol., 2002, 157–176, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x.
Russo, L., et al. Low concentrations of fertilizer and herbicide alter plant growth and interactions with flower-visiting insects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2020, 304, 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107141.
Scheper, J., et al. Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in the Netherlands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 17552–17557, 10.1073/pnas.1412973111.
Scheper, J., et al. Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries. J. Appl. Ecol., 2015, 1165–1175, 10.1111/1365-2664.12479.
Staley, J.T., et al. Changes in hedgerow floral diversity over 70years in an English rural landscape, and the impacts of management. Biol. Conserv. 167 (2013), 97–105, 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.033.
Staley, J.T., et al. Little and late: how reduced hedgerow cutting can benefit Lepidoptera. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2016, 22–28, 10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.018.
Threadgill, K.R.D., et al. Quantifying trade-offs between butterfly abundance and movement in the management of agricultural set-aside strips. Insect Conserv. Divers., 2021, 768–779, 10.1111/icad.12511.
Vaudo, A.D., et al. Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci., 2015, 133–141, 10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.008.
Warren, J., Christal, A., Wilson, F., 2002. Effects of sowing and management on vegetation succession during grassland habitat restoration. Ecosyst. Environ.
Warzecha, D., et al. Attractiveness of wildflower mixtures for wild bees and hoverflies depends on some key plant species. Insect Conserv. Divers., 2018, 32–41, 10.1111/icad.12264.
Weiner, C.N., et al. Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology, 2014.
Westbury, D.B., et al. Buffer strip management to deliver plant and invertebrate resources for farmland birds in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2017, 215–223, 10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.031.
Wickham, H., ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2016, Springer-Verlag, New York 〈http://ggplot2.org〉.
Winfree, R., et al. A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology, 2009, 2068–2076, 10.1890/08-1245.1.
Wood, T.J., Roberts, S.P.M., An assessment of historical and contemporary diet breadth in polylectic Andrena bee species. Biol. Conserv., 2017, 72–80, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.09.009.
Wood, T.J., Holland, J.M., Goulson, D., Pollinator-friendly management does not increase the diversity of farmland bees and wasps. Biol. Conserv., 2015, 120–126, 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.04.022.
Wood, T.J., Holland, J.M., Goulson, D., Providing foraging resources for solitary bees on farmland: current schemes for pollinators benefit a limited suite of species. J. Appl. Ecol. 54:1 (2017), 323–333, 10.1111/1365-2664.12718.
