Teachers' perceptions of the new Massachusetts teacher evaluation instrument and process on instructional practice

Title:
Teachers' perceptions of the new Massachusetts teacher evaluation instrument and process on instructional practice
Creator:
Thomson, David L. (Author)
Contributor:
Unger, Christopher (Advisor)
Ewell, Sara (Committee member)
Martes, Christopher (Committee member)
Publisher:
Boston, Massachusetts : Northeastern University, 2013
Date Accepted:
November 2013
Date Awarded:
December 2013
Type of resource:
Text
Genre:
Doctoral theses
Format:
electronic
Digital origin:
born digital
Abstract/Description:
This mixed methods study explored whether teachers who have experienced the new Massachusetts evaluation system as a member of three pilot or early adopter districts perceive it as a valuable process. The Race to the Top federal grant process required states to redesign evaluation systems that fostered effective teaching and included student achievement data in educator evaluation systems. Massachusetts designed a model system that incorporated teacher self-reflection based on a comprehensive teacher evaluation rubric, the setting of SMART goals to improve professional practice and student achievement, and evaluations based on the comprehensive teacher evaluation rubric which represents the standards and indicators of effective teaching. In the future, measures of student achievement and student surveys will become part of the evaluation system. Teacher perceptions were measured using survey and focus group data to describe their experiences with the pilot of the new Massachusetts evaluation system. Research questions included the following: how do teachers perceive the new Massachusetts teacher evaluation system as a valid and useful tool for changing their teaching practice?; how do teachers perceive the evaluation process of self-reflection, goal setting, and evaluation using the rubric as valid and worthwhile assessment of effective teaching?; and how do teachers perceive their use of the tool and engagement in the process as an effective means toward changing their teaching practice for greater student achievement? Results overall were mixed with some groups reporting positively and others less so. There were significant differences found between two districts and between the high school and middle school categories. It is unclear if these differences were due to district level experiences or differences between the levels of school. Understanding the differences in teacher perceptions and its ramifications will foster future positive implementations and improvements in teacher performance and, perhaps, student achievement. Positive improvements in teaching practice hold the potential to increase teacher quality and student achievement. If educators do not see the new evaluation system as improving practice, then the system should be adjusted to ensure this essential aspect is achieved.
Subjects and keywords:
comprehensive teacher evaluation rubric
Danielson Evaluation model
Massachusetts model evaluation system
SMART goals
student achievement
Education
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Teacher Education and Professional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17760/d20004874
Permanent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20004874
Use and reproduction:
In Copyright: This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the right-holder(s). (http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/)
Copyright restrictions may apply.

Downloads