English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Effect of nitrate on sulfur transformations in sulfidogenic sludge of a marine aquaculture biofilter

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons210773

Schwermer,  C. U.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210363

Ferdelman,  T. G.
Department of Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons56955

Stief,  P.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210399

Gieseke,  A.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210257

de Beer,  D.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210761

Schramm,  A.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Schwermer10.pdf
(Publisher version), 301KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schwermer, C. U., Ferdelman, T. G., Stief, P., Gieseke, A., Rezakhani, N., van Rijn, J., et al. (2010). Effect of nitrate on sulfur transformations in sulfidogenic sludge of a marine aquaculture biofilter. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 72(3), 476-484.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-CADE-2
Abstract
The effect of NO3− addition on dissimilatory SO42− reduction and sulfide conversion in organic-rich sludge from the digestion basin of a recirculating marine aquaculture system was studied. SO42− reduction could only explain a minor fraction (up to 4–9%) of the observed total sulfide production (up to 35 mmol L−1 day−1), indicating that the main source of sulfide in the sludge was not SO42− reduction, but desulfuration during the decomposition of organic matter. Although NO3− inhibited SO42− reduction, but not desulfuration, the primary NO3− mitigation effect was the onset of NO3−-mediated sulfide oxidation (up to 75 mmol L−1 day−1), partially to elemental sulfur (S0). Above NO3− concentrations of 0.6 mM in the bulk water, the net sulfide production and oxidation zones were moved deeper into flocs and sludge cores, which effectively prevented sulfide from entering the water column. However, the sulfide efflux from the sludge instantly recovered after NO3− depletion. Thus, the NO3− level in the water column controls the zonation and magnitude of sulfur transformations in the sludge. The effect of NO3− relies therefore on its sustained presence in the water column, which in turn depends on a well-functioning nitrification in the mariculture system.