Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

An exploratory study of adolescent response to fluoxetine using psychological and biological predictors

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons129892

Chen,  Alon
Dept. Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Zohar, A. H., Eilat, T., Amitai, M., Taler, M., Bari, R., Chen, A., et al. (2018). An exploratory study of adolescent response to fluoxetine using psychological and biological predictors. PEERJ, 6: e4240. doi:10.7717/peerj.4240.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-5E42-B
Zusammenfassung
Background. Not enough is known about predicting therapeutic response to serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, and specifically to fluoxetine. This exploratory study. used psychological and biological markers for (retrospective) prediction of treatment response to fluoxetine in depressed and/or anxious adolescents.
Methods. Forty-one consecutive adolescent outpatients with a primary diagnosis of severe affective and/or anxiety disorders were assessed and treated with an open-label 8-week trial of fluoxetine. Type D personality was assessed with the 14-item questionnaire, the DS14. In addition, TNF alpha, IL-6, and IL-lb were measured pre- and post-treatment.
Results. There was an elevation of Type D personality in patients, compared to the adolescent population rate. Post-treatment, 44% of patients were classified as non responders; the relative risk of non-response for Type D personality patients was 2.8. Binary logistic regression predicting response vs. non-response showed a contribution of initial TNFa levels as well as Type D personality to non-response.
Conclusions. In this exploratory study, the most significant contributor to non response was Type D personality. However, the measurement of Type D was not prospective, and thus may be confounded with psychiatric morbidity. The measurement of personalityy in psychiatric setting may contribute to the understanding of treatment response and have clinical utility.