English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Hydrodynamic interaction of AFM cantilevers with solid walls: An investigation based on AFM noise analysis

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons47634

Benmouna,  F.
MPI for Polymer Research, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons48112

Johannsmann,  Diethelm
MPI for Polymer Research, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Benmouna, F., & Johannsmann, D. (2002). Hydrodynamic interaction of AFM cantilevers with solid walls: An investigation based on AFM noise analysis. European Physical Journal E, 9(5), 435-441. doi:10.1140/epje/i2002-10096-x.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-6481-6
Abstract
The noise power spectrum of the thermally activated motion of an AFM cantilever has been analyzed with respect to viscoelastic and hydrodynamic coupling between the cantilever and a substrate surface. Spheres with radii between 5 and 25 mum were glued to the cantilever to provide a well-defined geometry. The cantilever is modeled as a harmonic resonator with a frequency-dependent complex drag coefficient xi(omega). The variation of the drag coefficient xi(omega) with the tip- sample distance, D, and the sphere radius, R, can be expressed as a function of the single dimensionless parameter D/R. However, this scaling breaks down close to the surface. There are two sources of a frequency dependence of xi(omega), which are viscoelastic memory and hydrodynamics. Viscoelastic relaxation is observed when the surface is covered with a soft polymer layer. In the absence of such a soft layer one still finds a frequency dependence of xi(omega) which is caused by hydrodynamics. At large substrate-cantilever distances, the drag coefficient increases with frequency because,of inertial effects. At small distances, on the other hand, the drag coefficient decreases with increasing frequency, which is explained by the reflection of shear waves from the substrate surface. In liquids, inertial effects can be important when performing dynamic AFM experiments.