English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Positive association between forest management, environmental change, and forest bird abundance

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons62549

Schulze,  Ernst Detlef
Emeritus Group, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons128340

Guderle,  Marcus
Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. S. E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

BGC3014.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schulze, E. D., Craven, D., Durso, A. M., Reif, J., Guderle, M., Kroiher, F., et al. (2019). Positive association between forest management, environmental change, and forest bird abundance. Forest Ecosystems, 6: 3. doi:10.1186/s40663-019-0160-8.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-16A4-B
Abstract
Background: The global decrease in wildlife populations, especially birds, is mainly due to land use change and
increasing intensity of land use (Parmesan and Yohe 2003). However, impacts of management tools to mitigate
biodiversity loss at regional and global scales are less apparent in forest regions that have a constant forest area,
and which did not suffer from habitat degradation, and where forests are sustainably managed, such as in Central
Europe or the northeastern USA. A biodiversity assessment for Germany suggested, for example, that bird
populations were constant (Bundesamt für Naturschutz 2015).
Results: This study shows that changes in the environment and in forest management over the past 45 years have
had a significant, positive effect on the abundance of non-migratory forest bird species in Central Europe. Economy
(timber prices and GDP), forest management (timber harvest and mixed forest area), and environmental factors
(atmospheric CO2 concentration and nitrogen deposition) were investigated together with changes in abundances
of migratory and non-migratory forest birds using partial least squares path modeling. Climate change, resulting in
longer seasons and milder winters, and forest management, promoting tree diversity, were significantly positively
related to the abundance of non-migratory forest birds and explained 92% of the variation in their abundance in
Europe. Regionally-migrating forest birds had stable populations with large variation, while birds migrating across
continents declined in recent decades, suggesting significant, contrasting changes in bird populations in Europe. In
northeastern North America we also found evidence that non-migratory forests have experienced long-term
increases in abundance, and this increase was related to management. The increase of populations of nonmigratory
forest birds in Europe and North America is associated with an increase in structural diversity and
disturbances at the landscape level.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that reports about bird decline in forests should separate between migratory and
non-migratory bird species. Efforts to mitigate the general decline in bird abundance should focus on land-use
systems other than forests and support sustainable forest management independent of economic conditions.