Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Rezension

How not to do things with international law - Review essay "Hurd, Ian: How to Do Things with International Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018."

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons236852

Peters,  Anne
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Peters, A. (2018). How not to do things with international law - Review essay "Hurd, Ian: How to Do Things with International Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018." Ethics & international affairs, 32(4), 483-491. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000746.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-E65E-1
Zusammenfassung
In his recent book, Ian Hurd argues that international law is pervasive and foundational in international affairs and that the international rule of law is hegemonic over states. While the book is provocative and compelling, it fails to convince on two core points. First, Hurd does not offer a real alternative to international relations realism. Indeed, the book could unwittingly reinforce the realist stance that international law is simply power politics in disguise. Second, the book offers a problematic conception of international rule of law. What Hurd describes is at best a rule by law, or perhaps more appropriately qualified as a travesty of the rule of law.