Is bilingual speech production language-specific or non-specific? The case of 
gender congruency in Dutch – English bilinguals

Schiller, Niels O.; Verdonschot, Rinus G.

doi:10.1075/z.210.09sch

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Buchkapitel

Is bilingual speech production language-specific or non-specific? The case of gender congruency in Dutch – English bilinguals

MPG-Autoren

Es sind keine MPG-Autoren in der Publikation vorhanden

Externe Ressourcen

Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)

Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Schiller_Verdonschot_2017_Is bilingual speech production....pdf
(Verlagsversion), 620KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Schiller, N. O., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2017). Is bilingual speech production language-specific or non-specific? The case of gender congruency in Dutch – English bilinguals. In H. Reckman, L.-L.-S. Cheng, M. Hijzelendoorn, & R. Sybesma (Eds.), Crossroads semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar (pp. 139-154). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-E143-E

Zusammenfassung

The present paper looks at semantic interference and gender congruency effects during bilingual picture-word naming. According to Costa, Miozzo & Caramazza (1999), only the activation from lexical nodes within a language is considered during lexical selection. If this is accurate, these findings should uphold with respect to semantic and gender/determiner effects even though the distractors are in another language. In the present study three effects were found, (1) a main effect of language, (2) semantic effects for both target language and non-target language distractors, and (3) gender congruency effects for targets with target-language distractors only. These findings are at odds with the language-specific proposal of Costa et al. (1999). Implications of these findings are discussed.