English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Comparing the aesthetic experience of classic–romantic and contemporary classical music: An interview study (Online First)

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons200142

Mencke,  Iris       
Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons195495

Seibert,  Christoph       
Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Institute for Music Informatics and Musicology, University of Music Karlsruhe, Germany;

/persons/resource/persons133247

Wald-Fuhrmann,  Melanie       
Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

mus-22-men-01-comparing.pdf
(Publisher version), 325KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mencke, I., Seibert, C., Brattico, E., & Wald-Fuhrmann, M. (2022). Comparing the aesthetic experience of classic–romantic and contemporary classical music: An interview study (Online First). Psychology of Music. doi:10.1177/03057356221091312.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-9C9A-9
Abstract
Current models of aesthetic experience of music (AEM) have emerged in the recent years capitalizing on evidence from psychology and neuroscience research, thus modeling mainly cognitive and information processes in the brain. However, a large part of the empirical research on which these models are based is related to Western tonal music, while another style of Western music, namely, contemporary classical music (CCM), has been almost neglected. CCM is often dissonant and lacks a tonal hierarchical structure, as, for example, in serial musical pieces. The current study qualitatively explored aesthetic dimensions of a CCM experience by contrasting it to classic–romantic music (CM). To this end, 16 semi-structured interviews with experts of both CCM (n = 8) and CM (n = 8) were conducted. The interview guide consisted of questions relating to physiological, affective, and cognitive dimensions of music listening. We applied qualitative content analysis on the textual material and compared the emerging main and sub-themes between the groups. Our findings show that especially the categories of expectations, physiological and emotional responses, pleasurable aspects, and, lastly, existential relevance revealed striking differences which allow us to conclude that CM and CCM afford distinguishable types of AEM in listeners.