English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

A shared pattern of midfacial bone modelling in hominids suggests deep evolutionary roots for human facial morphogenesis

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons192487

Schuh,  Alexandra       
Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72716

Gunz,  Philipp       
Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72760

Hublin,  Jean-Jacques       
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72679

Freidline,  Sarah E.       
Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schuh, A., Heuzé, Y., Gunz, P., Berthaume, M. A., Shaw, C. N., Hublin, J.-J., et al. (2024). A shared pattern of midfacial bone modelling in hominids suggests deep evolutionary roots for human facial morphogenesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291. doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.2738.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-3B75-C
Abstract
Midfacial morphology varies between hominoids, in particular between great apes and humans for which the face is small and retracted. The underlying developmental processes for these morphological differences are still largely unknown. Here, we investigate the cellular mechanism of maxillary development (bone modelling, BM), and how potential changes in this process may have shaped facial evolution. We analysed cross-sectional developmental series of gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and present-day humans (n = 183). Individuals were organized into five age groups according to their dental development. To visualize each species’s BM pattern and corresponding morphology during ontogeny, maps based on microscopic data were mapped onto species-specific age group average shapes obtained using geometric morphometrics. The amount of bone resorption was quantified and compared between species. Great apes share a highly similar BM pattern, whereas gibbons have a distinctive resorption pattern. This suggests a change in cellular activity on the hominid branch. Humans possess most of the great ape pattern, but bone resorption is high in the canine area from birth on, suggesting a key role of canine reduction in facial evolution. We also observed that humans have high levels of bone resorption during childhood, a feature not shared with other apes. © 2024 Royal Society Publishing. All rights reserved.