Loughborough University
Browse
Fong_threshold_v2-0b.pdf (467.59 kB)

In-shoe pressure thresholds for people with diabetes and neuropathy at risk of ulceration: A systematic review

Download (467.59 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-12-10, 15:59 authored by Petra Jones, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Daniel FongDaniel Fong, David Webb
Introduction
In-shoe pressure thresholds play an increasingly important role in the prevention of diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU). The evidence of their effectiveness, methodological consistency and scope for refinement are the subject of this review.
Methods
1,107 records were identified (after duplicate removal) based on a search of five databases for studies which applied a specific in-shoe pressure threshold to reduce the risk of ulceration. 37 full text studies were assessed for eligibility of which 21 were included.
Results
Five in-shoe pressure thresholds were identified, which are employed to reduce the risk of diabetes-related foot ulceration: a mean peak pressure threshold of 200 kPa used in conjunction with a 25% baseline reduction target; a sustained pressure threshold of 35 mmHG, a threshold matrix based on risk, shoe size and foot region, and a 40-80% baseline pressure reduction target. The effectiveness of the latter two thresholds have not been assessed yet and the evidence for the effectiveness of the other in-shoe pressure thresholds is limited, based only on two RCTs and two cohort studies.
Conclusions
The heterogeneity of current measures precludes meta-analysis and further research and methodological standardisation is required to facilitate ready comparison and the further development of these pressure thresholds.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Volume

35

Issue

3

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© Elsevier

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Journal of Diabetes and its Complications and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107815

Acceptance date

2020-11-18

Publication date

2020-11-26

Copyright date

2020

ISSN

1056-8727

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Daniel Fong Deposit date: 7 December 2020

Article number

107815

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC