10.1515_bejm-2020-0250.pdf (963.91 kB)
COVID social distancing and the poor: an analysis of the evidence for England
journal contribution
posted on 2022-02-04, 14:56 authored by Parantap Basu, Clive Bell, Huw EdwardsHuw EdwardsSocial distancing is a matter of individuals’ choices as well as of regulation. We analyse weekly panel data on such behaviour for English Upper Tier Local Authorities (UTLAs) from March to July 2020, paying attention to the influence of poverty, as measured by free school meals provision. Panel regressions suggest that, although more stringent regulation and slightly lagged local cases of infection increase social distancing, both effects are weaker in UTLAs with higher levels of poverty, in part because of poor housing, and also because shortage of money has forced the poor to keep working. Thus motivated, we develop a two-class (rich/poor) model, in which a Nash non-cooperative equilibrium arises from individual choices in a regulatory regime with penalties for non-compliance. The model yields results in keeping with the empirical findings, indicating the desirability of generous measures to furlough workers in low-paid jobs as a complement to the stringency of general regulation.
History
School
- Business and Economics
Department
- Economics
Published in
The B.E. Journal of MacroeconomicsVolume
22Issue
1Pages
211 - 240Publisher
De GruyterVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by De Gruyter under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Acceptance date
2021-01-31Publication date
2021-02-16Copyright date
2021ISSN
1935-1690eISSN
1935-1690Publisher version
Language
- en
Depositor
Dr Huw Edwards. Deposit date: 31 January 2021Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC