psyp.13915.pdf (291.45 kB)
The effect of autonomous and controlled motivation on self-control performance and the acute cortisol response
journal contribution
posted on 2021-08-17, 09:15 authored by Richard Steel, Nicolette BishopNicolette Bishop, Ian TaylorIan TaylorAutonomously regulated self-control typically does not reduce over time as much,
compared with self-control underpinned by controlled motivation. The proposed
study tested whether an acute stress response is implicated in this process. Utilizing a
framework grounded in self-determination theory, this study examined whether participants' motivational regulation would influence repeated self-control performance
and acute stress levels, measured by the stress hormone cortisol. A single-blind
randomized experimental design incorporating two motivational conditions (autonomous regulation and controlled regulation) tested these hypotheses. Participants (female = 28; male = 11; Mage = 22.33) performed three sequential self-control tasks; a
modified Stroop task followed by two “wall sit” postural persistence tasks. Salivary
cortisol was measured at baseline and after each of the wall sits. A repeated measures
ANCOVA unexpectedly revealed that participants in the controlled regulation condition recorded greater wall sit performance in the first and second wall sits, compared
with the autonomous condition. A repeated measures ANCOVA also revealed a significant quadratic interaction for cortisol. Controlled regulation was associated with
an increase, and autonomous regulation condition a decrease, in cortisol that subsided at timepoint two. Results imply autonomous motivation facilitates an adaptive
stress response. Performance on the self-control tasks was contrary to expectations,
but may reflect short-term performance benefits of controlled motivation.
Funding
National Institute for Health Research
History
School
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
PsychophysiologyVolume
58Issue
11Publisher
Wiley on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological ResearchVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The authorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Wiley under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Acceptance date
2021-07-13Publication date
2021-08-08Copyright date
2021ISSN
0048-5772eISSN
1469-8986Publisher version
Language
- en
Depositor
Dr Ian Taylor. Deposit date: 17 August 2021Article number
e13915Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
ego-depletionorganismic integration theoryself-determination theoryself-regulationstressSocial SciencesScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicinePsychology, BiologicalNeurosciencesPhysiologyPsychologyPsychology, ExperimentalNeurosciences & NeurologySTRENGTH MODELINTRINSIC MOTIVATIONEGO-DEPLETIONSTRESSTASKFAILURECHOICEGOALSExperimental PsychologyBiological SciencesMedical and Health SciencesPsychology and Cognitive Sciences
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC