Loughborough University
Browse
A randomised controlled clinical trial to assess the benefits of a telecare tool delivered prior to the initial hearing assessment.pdf (1.95 MB)

A randomised controlled clinical trial to assess the benefits of a telecare tool delivered prior to the initial hearing assessment

Download (1.95 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-05, 15:53 authored by David MaidmentDavid Maidment, E Heffernan, MA Ferguson
Objective. To assess the benefits of the Ida Institute’s Why improve my hearing? Telecare Tool used before the initial hearing assessment appointment.
Design. A prospective, single-blind randomised clinical trial with two arms: (i) Why improve my hearing? Telecare Tool intervention, and (ii) standard care control.
Study sample. Adults with hearing loss were recruited from two Audiology Services within the United Kingdom’s publicly-funded National Health Service. Of 461 individuals assessed for eligibility, 57 were eligible to participate.
Results. Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-efficacy for Hearing Aids (primary outcome) scores did not differ between groups from baseline to post-assessment (Mean change [Δ]= -2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]= -6.70, 2.15, p= .307) and 10-weeks follow-up (Mean Δ= - 2.69; 95% CI= -9.52, 4.15, p= .434). However, Short Form Patient Activation Measure scores significantly improved in the intervention group compared to the control group from baseline to post-assessment (Mean Δ= -6.06, 95% CI= -11.31, -0.82, p= .024, ES= .61) and 10-weeks follow-up (Mean Δ= -9.87, 95% CI= -15.34, -4.40, p= .001, ES= -.97).
Conclusions. This study demonstrates that while a patient-centred telecare intervention completed before management decisions may not improve an individual’s self-efficacy to manage their hearing loss, it can lead to improvements in readiness.

Funding

Ida Institute

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

International Journal of Audiology

Volume

62

Issue

5

Pages

400-409

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Taylor & Francis under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2022-03-22

Publication date

2022-04-18

Copyright date

2022

ISSN

1499-2027

eISSN

1708-8186

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr David Maidment. Deposit date: 24 March 2022

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC