Loughborough University
Browse
Author accepted MS.pdf (515.38 kB)

Comparison of murderers with recidivists and first time incarcerated offenders from U.S. prisons on psychopathy and identity as a criminal: An exploratory analysis

Download (515.38 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-05-16, 08:47 authored by Nicole Sherretts, Daniel Boduszek, Agata Debowska, Dominic WillmottDominic Willmott

Purpose: 

Previous research conceptualized murderers as highly callous and self-gratifying individuals, offending as a result of psychopathic tendencies. The current exploration sought to verify whether murderers differ on psychopathy and criminal social identity from recidivistic and first time incarcerated offenders. 

Methods: 

The study compared an opportunistic sample of murderers (n = 94), recidivists (n = 266), and first time offenders (n = 118) on criminal social identity (3 factors: cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties) and psychopathy (4 factors: callous affect, interpersonal manipulation, erratic lifestyle, antisocial behavior). 

Results: 

Recidivists scored significantly higher on cognitive centrality and in-group ties than murderers. Recidivists scored significantly higher than first time incarcerated offenders or murderers on the erratic lifestyle and interpersonal manipulation factors of psychopathy. Additionally, recidivists scored significantly higher on antisocial behavior compared to first time offenders. All three groups of prisoners did not differ in terms of callous affect. 

Conclusion: 

Contrary to previous research and media portrayals of homicide perpetration being rooted in psychopathic tendencies such as callous affect, the present findings found no support for such a conceptualization of the crime. Moreover, unsurprisingly, it appears murderers have less developed criminal cognitions than other offending groups.

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Department

  • Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy

Published in

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volume

51

Pages

89 - 92

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© Elsevier

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the Journal of Criminal Justice and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.03.002

Acceptance date

2017-03-28

Publication date

2017-04-02

Copyright date

2017

ISSN

0047-2352

eISSN

1873-6203

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Dom Willmott. Deposit date: 21 April 2022

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC