[en] The paper’s goals are to identify key challenges in the currentwindthrow management framework and present a blueprint for howto progress in the settlement of regional strategies.SWOT analyses are used to highlight relevant issues and opportunities in classical approaches from both the forest-based sector and public authorities’ perspectives. Despite the large body of knowledge that allows decision-makers to react promptly after huge storms, strategic responses still suffer from too individual and fragmented decisions and a lack of holistic economic assessments. To tackle these issues, the paper suggests using systemic and integrated risk management approaches. It also presents the ways to enhance the forest-based sector’s resistance and resilience towards economic shock and supports decision-making with the help of systemic analysis. This shift of paradigm is one of the key requirements in optimizing the way of dealing with storm damage, but public authorities should concur with it more actively by improving decisional and administrative frameworks. Contribution of the co-authors Co-authors are PhD thesis’ supervisors and have thoroughly reviewed the paper.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Riguelle, Simon ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Form. doct. sc. agro. & ingé. biol.
Hebert, Jacques ; Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Jourez, Benoît ; Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Language :
English
Title :
Integrated and systemic management of storm damage by the forest-based sector and public authorities
Ananda J, Herath G (2003) The use of analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy Econ 5:13–26. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00043-6
Ananda J, Herath G (2009) A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecol Econ 68:2535–2548. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010
Angst C, Volz R (2002) A decision-support tool for managing storm-damaged forests. For Snow Landsc Res 77:217–224
Aven T (2009) Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context—review and discussion. Saf Sci 47:798–806. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.008
Aven T, Kristensen V (2005) Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2004.10.008
Barredo JI (2010) No upward trend in normalised windstorm losses in Europe: 1970–2008. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:97–104. doi:10.5194/nhess-10-97-2010
Bartet J-H, Mortier F (2002) Guide: Gérer la crise “Chablis”. Office National des Forêts, Paris
Barthod C, Barrillon A (2002) L’Etat au secours de la forêt: le plan gouvernemental. Rev for fr LIV:41–65. doi: 10.4267/2042/4986
Baur P, Holthausen N, Roschewitz A, Bernath K (2004) Tempêtes en forêt. En quoi l’économie forestière se distingue des autres secteurs. Forêt 10:11–15
Bavard D, de Lagarde O, Magrum M (2013) Évaluation du volet mobilisation des bois chablis—Plan de solidarité nationale consécutif à la tempête Klaus du 24 janvier 2009. Conseil général de l’alimentation, de l’agriculture et des espaces ruraux (CGAAER), Paris
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London
Beierle TC (2002) The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Anal 22:739–749
Birot Y (2002) Tempêtes et forêts: perturbations, catastrophes ou opportunités ? Ann Mines Août 2002:96–102
Birot Y, Gollier C (2001) Risk assessment, management and sharing in forestry, with special emphasis on windstorms. In: Kokkonen O (ed) Proceedings of 14th Convocation of the International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences (CAETS), Espoo
Birot Y, Gardiner B (2013) Challenges for forestry in relation to storms. In: Gardiner B, Schuck A, Schelhaas M-J, Orazio C, Blennow K, Nicoll B (eds) Living with storm damage to forests. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 123–129
Birot Y, Landmann G, Bonhême I (2009) La forêt face aux tempêtes. Quae, Versailles
Bisang K, Zimmermann W (2006) Key concepts and methods of programme evaluation and conclusions from forestry practice in Switzerland. Forest Policy Econ 8:502–511. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.002
Björheden R (2007) Possible effects of the hurricane Gudrun on the regional Swedish forest energy supply. Biomass Bioenerg 31:617–622. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.025
Blennow K (2008) Risk management in Swedish forestry—policy formation and fulfillment of goals. J Risk Res 11:237–254. doi:10.1080/13669870801939415
Blennow K, Persson E (2013) Societal impacts of storm damage. In: Gardiner B, Schuck A, Schelhaas M-J, Orazio C, Blennow K, Nicoll B (eds) Living with storm damage to forests. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 70–78
Blennow K, Sallnäs O (2005) Decision support for active risk management in sustainable forestry. J Sustain For 21:201–212. doi:10.1300/J091v21n02-12
Blennow K, Persson J, Wallin A, Vareman N, Persson E (2014) Understanding risk in forest ecosystem services: implications for effective risk management, communication and planning. Forestry 87:219–228. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpt032
Bossel H (Coord.) (2002) Assessing viability and sustainability: a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conserv Ecol. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art12/. Accessed 9 May 2016
Bouget C, Duelli P (2004) The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol Conserv 118:281–299. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.009
Broman H, Frisk M, Rönnqvist M (2009) Supply chain planning of harvest and transportation operations after the storm Gudrun. INFOR 47:235–245
Bründl M, Rickli C (2002) The storm Lothar 1999 in Switzerland—an incident analysis. For Snow Landsc Res 77:207–216
Brunet S (2007) Société du risque: quelles réponses politiques ? L’Harmattan, Paris
Brunette M, Couture S (2008) Public compensation for windstorm damage reduces incentives for risk management investments. Forest Policy Econ 10:491–499. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.05.001
Brunette M, Holecy J, Sedliak M, Tucek J, Hanewinkel M (2015) An actuarial model of forest insurance against multiple natural hazards in fir (Abies Alba Mill.) stands in Slovakia. Forest Policy Econ 55:46–57. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.03.001
Buttoud G (2000) How can policy take into consideration the “full value” of forests? Land Use Policy 17:169–175. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00015-6
Buttoud G, Kouplevatskaya-Buttoud I, Slee B, Weiss G (2011) Barriers to institutional learning and innovations in the forest sector in Europe: markets, policies and stakeholders. Forest Policy Econ 13:124–131. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.05.006
Campbell B, Sayer JA, Frost P, Vermeulen S, Ruiz-Pérez M, Cunningham T, Prabhu R (2002) Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Conserv Ecol. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art22/. Accessed 9 May 2016
Campioli M, Vincke C, Jonard M, Kint V, Demarée G, Ponette Q (2012) Current status and predicted impact of climate change on forest production and biogeochemistry in the temperate oceanic European zone: review and prospects for Belgium as a case study. J For Res 17:1–18. doi:10.1007/s10310-011-0255-8
Caurla S, Lecocq F, Delacote P, Barkaoui A (2010) The French forest sector model: version 1.0. Presentation and theorical foundations. Laboratoire d’Economie Forestière, Nancy
Caurla S, Garcia S, Niedzwiedz A (2015) Store or export? An economic evaluation of financial compensation to forest sector after windstorm. The case of hurricane Klaus. Forest Policy Econ 61:30–38. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.005
Chtioui Y, Kaulfuß S, Hartebrodt C (2015) Forest crisis management advisory guide. Forest Research Institut Baden-Württemberg (FVA). http://www.waldwissen.net/waldwirtschaft/schaden/fva_ratgeber_forstliches_krisenmanagement_startseite/index_EN. Accessed 15 Mar 2016
Corvol A (2005) Tempêtes sur la forêt française. L’Harmattan, Paris
Costa S, Ibanez L (2005) Can wood storage be profitable? French experience after the windstorms in 1999. J For Econ 11:161–176. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2005.08.001
de Rosnay J (1997) Analytic vs. systemic approaches. In: Heylighen F, Joslyn C, Turchin V (eds) Principia Cybernetica web, Principia Cybernetica, Brussels http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/analsyst.html
Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2008) Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: a review and an assessment. For Ecol Manag 255:3222–3241. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.038
Direction des Forêts (1987) Les réactions des pouvoirs publics lors de la tempête des 6, 7 et 8 novembre 1982. Rev For Fr 39:257–268. doi:10.4267/2042/25795
Drouineau S, Laroussinie O, Birot Y, Terrasson D, Formery T, Roman-Amat B (2000) Expertise collective sur les tempêtes, la sensibilité des forêts et leur reconstitution. INRA-MES, Paris
European Commission (2013a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. A new EU Forest Strategy: for forests and the forest-based sector. COM (2013) 659 final
European Commission (2013b) Green paper on the insurance of natural and man-made disasters. COM (2013) 213 final
FAO/ECE/ILO (1996) Manual on acute forest damage—managing the impact of sudden and severe forest damage. United Nations, Geneva
Fares S, Scarascia Mugnozza G, Corona P, Palahí M (2015) Five steps for managing Europe’s forests. Nature 519:407–409
Fermet-Quinet S (2013) Outils institutionnels, systèmes et organisation pour l’anticipation, le suivi et la gestion des risques naturels dans les forêts du Sud-Ouest de l’Europe. Diagnostic de la gestion du risque sanitaire. Mémoire de dominante forestière, ENGREF—AgroParisTech
FIBOIS (2010a) Actions préventives et propositions d’organisation de la filière en cas de nouvel aléa climatique. FIBOIS Alsace, Schiltigheim
FIBOIS (2010b) Traduction opérationnelle de l’audit tempête. Rapport final. FIBOIS Alsace, Schiltigheim
Fink AH, Brücher T, Ermert V, Krüger A, Pinto JG (2009) The European storm Kyrill in January 2007: synoptic evolution, meteorological impacts and some considerations with respect to climate change. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:405–423. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-405-2009
Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev 100:541–556. doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.541
Forest Windblow Action Committee (1988) Guidelines for dealing with windblow in woodlands: marketing, sale and restocking in woods damaged by the storm of 16th October 1987. Forest Research Station, Farnham Surrey
Gamper CD, Turcanu C (2009) Can public participation help managing risks from natural hazards? Saf Sci 47:522–528. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.005
Garcia-Gonzalo J, Palma J, Freire J, Tomé M, Mateus R, Rodriguez LCE, Bushenkov V, Borges JG (2013) A decision support system for a multi stakeholder’s decision process in a Portuguese national forest. For Syst 22:359–373. doi:10.5424/fs/2013222-03793
Gardiner BA, Quine CP (2000) Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage—a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds. For Ecol Manag 135:261–277. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00285-1
Gardiner B, Blennow K, Carnus J-M, Fleischer M, Ingemarson F, Landmann G, Lindner M, Marzano M, Nicoll B, Orazio C, Peyron J-L, Reviron M-P, Schelhaas M-J, Schuck A, Spielmann M, Usbeck T (2010) Destructive storms in European forests: past and forthcoming impacts. Final report to the European Commission—DG Environment. European Forest Institute, Joensuu
Gardiner B, Schuck A, Schelhaas M-J, Orazio C, Blennow K, Nicoll B (2013) Living with storm damage to forests. European Forest Institute, Joensuu
GIP ECOFOR (2010) Retour sur la gestion de crise suite à la tempête Klaus et éléments d’anticipation. Expertise sur l’avenir du massif forestier des Landes de Gascogne, Rapport de synthèse Groupe de travail 1. GIP ECOFOR, Paris
Gopalakrishnan C, Okada N (2007) Designing new institutions for implementing integrated disaster risk management: key elements and future directions. Disasters 31:353–372. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01013.x
Grayson AJ (1989) The 1987 storm. Impacts and responses. Forestry Commission Bulletin 87. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
Greiving S, Pratzler-Wanczura S, Sapountzaki K, Ferri F, Grifoni P, Firus K, Xanthopoulos G (2012) Linking the actors and policies throughout the disaster management cycle by “agreement on objectives”—a new output-oriented management approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1085–1107. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-1085-2012
Haimes YY (2011) Risk modeling, assessment, and management. Wiley, Hoboken
Hammer S, Schmidt N, Iten R (2003) Lothar: kantonale Strategien. Umwelt-Materialien Nr. 154. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bern
Hanewinkel M, Hummel S, Albrecht A (2011) Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: a review. Eur J For Res 130:329–351. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0392-1
Hänsli C, Keel A, Kissling-Näf I, Zimmermann W (2003) Lothar sturmschäden im wald, 1999. Eine vergleichende analyse der politischen prozesse und der staatlichen massnahmen nach «Lothar» und «Martin» in der Schweiz, Deutschland und Frankreich – Synthesebericht. Umwelt-Materialien Nr. 159. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bern
Harmer R (2012) What happened in the woods? Weather 67:261–265. doi:10.1002/wea.1948
Hartebrodt C (2014) Essentials of practical forest crisis management. Forest Research Institute Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg
Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Ikonen VP, Peltola H, Venäläinen A, Dupont S (2009) Integrating the risk of wind damage into forest planning. For Ecol Manag 258:1567–1577. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.006
Heylighen F, Joslyn C (1992) What is systems theory? In: Heylighen F, Joslyn C, Turchin V (eds) Principia Cybernetica Web, Principia Cybernetica, Brussels http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/SYSTHEOR.html
Holecy J, Hanewinkel M (2006) A forest management risk insurance model and its application to coniferous stands in southwest Germany. Forest Policy Econ 8:161–174. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.05.009
Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL (2008) The economics of forest disturbances: wildfires, storms, and invasive species. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Honkavaara E, Litkey P, Nurminen K (2013) Automatic storm damage detection in forests using high-altitude photogrammetric imagery. Remote Sens 5:1405–1424. doi:10.3390/rs5031405
IPPC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management—principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Jactel H, Nicoll BC, Branco M, Gonzalez-Olabarria JR, Grodzki W, Långström B, Moreira F, Netherer S, Orazio C, Piou D, Santos H, Schelhaas MJ, Tojic K, Vodde F (2009) The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage. Ann For Sci 66:701–719. doi:10.1051/forest/2009054
Kamimura K, Shiraishi N (2007) A review of strategies for wind damage assessment in Japanese forests. J For Res 12:162–176. doi:10.1007/s10310-007-0005-0
Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
Keenan R (2015) Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: a review. Ann For Sci 72:145–167. doi:10.1007/s13595-014-0446-5
Laffite J-J, Lerat J-F (2009) Reconstitution des peuplements forestiers détruits par la tempête du 24 janvier 2009 dans le massif forestier des Landes de Gascogne. Conseil général de l’agriculture, de l’alimentation et des espaces ruraux (CGAAER), Paris
Lagergren F, Jönsson AM, Blennow K, Smith B (2012) Implementing storm damage in a dynamic vegetation model for regional applications in Sweden. Ecol Model 247:71–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.011
Lal P, Lim-Applegate H, Scoccimarro MC (2002) The adaptive decision-making process as a tool for integrated natural resource management: focus, attitudes, and approach. Conserv Ecol. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art11/. Accessed 9 May 2016
Landmann G, Held A, Schuck A, Van Brusselen J (eds) (2015) European forests at risk. A scoping study in support of the development of a European forest risk facility. European Forest Institute, Joensuu
Lesbats R (2002) Les conséquences des tempêtes de décembre 1999 sur la filière bois: des enseignements à en tirer. Conseil économique et social, Paris
Lesgourgues Y, Drouineau S (2009) Un plan d’urgence pour la filière pin maritime. CIPM, Bordeaux
Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolström M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
Lindroth A, Lagergren F, Grelle A, Klemedtsson L, Langvall OLA, Weslien PER, Tuulik J (2009) Storms can cause Europe-wide reduction in forest carbon sink. Glob Chang Biol 15:346–355. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01719.x
Lovell C, Mandondo A, Moriarty P (2002) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Conserv Ecol. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art25/. Accessed 9 May 2016
MAFF (1988) The effects of the great storm: report of a Technical Coordination Committee and the Government’s response. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
Marques AF, Borges JG, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Lucas B, Melo I (2013a) A participatory approach to design a toolbox to support forest management planning at regional level. For Syst 22:340–358. doi:10.5424/fs/2013222-03120
Marques AF, Fricko A, Kangas A, Rosset C, Ferreti F, Rasinmaki J, Packalen T, Gordon S (2013b) Empirical guidelines for forest management decision support systems based on the past experiences of the expert’s community. For Syst 22:320–339. doi:10.5424/fs/2013222-03033
Mendoza GA, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For Ecol Manag 230:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023
Meyer V, Becker N, Markantonis V, Schwarze R, van den Bergh JCJM, Bouwer LM, Bubeck P, Ciavola P, Genovese E, Green C, Hallegatte S, Kreibich H, Lequeux Q, Logar I, Papyrakis E, Pfurtscheller C, Poussin J, Przyluski V, Thieken AH, Viavattene C (2013) Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards—state of the art and knowledge gaps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1351–1373. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151. doi:10.1890/06-1715.1
Mitchell SJ (2013) Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. Forestry 86:147–157. doi:10.1093/forestry/cps058
Moore JR, Manley BR, Park D, Scarrott CJ (2013) Quantification of wind damage to New Zealand’s planted forests. Forestry 86:173–183. doi:10.1093/forestry/cps076
Mortier F, Bartet JH (2004) Intégrons la culture de gestion de crise en milieu naturel notamment à la lumière de l’expérience des tempêtes de 1999. Rev For Fr 56:307–321. doi:10.4267/2042/5103
Munich Re (2002) Winter storms in Europe (II). Munich Re Group, München
Nabuurs GJ, Pussinen A, van Brusselen J, Schelhaas MJ (2007) Future harvesting pressure on European forests. Eur J For Res 126:391–400. doi:10.1007/s10342-006-0158-y
Nicolas J-P (2009) Rapport d’information sur les conséquences de la tempête du 24 janvier 2009 dans le Sud-Ouest. Assemblée nationale, Paris
Nieuwenhuis M, O’connor E (2001) Financial impact evaluation of catastrophic storm damage in Irish forestry: a case study. I. Stumpage losses. Forestry 74:369–381. doi:10.1093/forestry/74.4.369
Nilsson S (2015) Is today’s systems analysis up-to-date for today’s and tomorrow’s decision- and policy making? 16th Symposium for Systems Analysis in Forest Resources (SSAFR), Uppsala, Sweden, 19–21 August 2015
Odenthal-Kahabka J (2005) Storm handbook—coping with storm damaged timber. Forest Research Institut Baden-Württemberg (FVA). http://www.waldwissen.net/waldwirtschaft/schaden/sturm_schnee_eis/fva_sturmhandbuch/index_EN. Accessed 12 Dec 2010
OFEV (2008) Aide-mémoire en cas de dégâts de tempête. Aide à l’exécution pour la maîtrise des dégâts dus à des tempêtes en forêt classées d’importance nationale. Office fédéral de l’environnement, Berne
O’Hara KL, Ramage BS (2013) Silviculture in an uncertain world: utilizing multi-aged management systems to integrate disturbance. Forestry 86:401–410. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpt012
Oosterbaan A, van den Berg CA, de Boer T, de Jong JJ, Moraal LG, Niemeijer CM, Veerkamp M, Verkaik E (2009) Storm en bosbeheer: afwegingen voor het laten liggen of ruimen van stormhout. Wageningen UR, Alterra
Orazio C, Régolini M, Meredieu C, Gardiner B, Cantero A, Fermet-Quinet S, Hevia A, Branco M, Picard O (2014) Gestion intégrée des risques en forêt: l’expérience du projet FORRISK. Proceedings of Carrefours de l’innovation agronomique, Bordeaux, 3 décembre 2014
Payn T, Carnus J-M, Freer-Smith P, Kimberley M, Kollert W, Liu S, Orazio C, Rodriguez L, Silva LN, Wingfield MJ (2015) Changes in planted forests and future global implications. For Ecol Manag 352:57–67. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.021
Petr M, Boerboom L, Ray D, van der Veen A (2014) An uncertainty assessment framework for forest planning adaptation to climate change. Forest Policy Econ 41:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.12.002
Peyron J-L, Blanchard G, Danguy des Déserts D (1999) Les tempêtes, une fatalité ? Rev For Fr LI:729–732. doi: 10.4267/2042/5680
Pinto JG, Fröhlich EL, Leckebusch GC, Ulbrich U (2007) Changing European storm loss potentials under modified climate conditions according to ensemble simulations of the ECHAM5/MPI-OM1 GCM. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:165–175. doi:10.5194/nhess-7-165-2007
Pischedda D (2004) Technical guide on harvesting and conservation of storm damaged timber. Concerted action QLK5-CT2001-00645 (STODAFOR project). CTBA, Paris
Prestemon JP, Holmes TP (2004) Market dynamics and optimal timber salvage after a natural catastrophe. For Sci 50:495–511
Raetz P (2004) Les enseignements de la gestion d’une crise. Synthèse du programme de recherche Lothar. Office fédéral de l’environnement, des forêts et du paysage (OFEFP), Berne
Rametsteiner E, Weiss G (2006a) Assessing policies from a systems perspecitve—experiences with applied innovation systems analysis and implications for policy evaluation. Forest Policy Econ 8:564–576. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.005
Rametsteiner E, Weiss G (2006b) Innovation and innovation policy in forestry: linking innovation process with systems models. Forest Policy Econ 8:691–703. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.009
Reynolds KM, Borges JG, Vacik H, Lexer MJ (2005) ICT in forest management and conservation. In: Hetemaki L, Nilsson S (eds) Information technology and the forest sector IUFRO world series volume 18. IUFRO, Vienna, pp 150–171
Reynolds KM, Twery M, Lexer MJ, Vacik H, Ray D, Shao G, Borges JG (2008) Decision support systems in natural resource management. In: Burnstein F, Holsapple C (eds) Handbook on decision support systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 499–534
Riguelle S (2010) Plan chablis—Guide pour la gestion des crises chablis en Wallonie. Service public de Wallonie, Jambes
Riguelle S, Hébert J, Jourez B, Rommelaere A (2011) Le plan chablis: un outil de planification d’urgence et de gestion de crise pour la forêt wallonne. Forêt Wallonne 111:3–9
Riguelle S, Hébert J, Jourez B (2015) WIND-STORM: a decision support system for the strategic management of windthrow crises by the forest community. Forests 6:3412–3432. doi:10.3390/f6103412
Sauter P, Möllmann T, Anastassiadis F, Musshoff O, Möhring B (2016) To insure forests assets or not? An analysis of foresters behavior. Proceedings of IUFRO Risk Analysis Meeting, Freiburg, Germany
Sayer JA, Campbell B (2002) Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection, and human development. Conserv Ecol. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art32/. Accessed 9 May 2016
Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Schuck A (2003) Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob Chang Biol 9:1620–1633. doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00684.x
Schelhaas MJ, Hengeveld G, Moriondo M, Reinds GJ, Kundzewicz ZW, ter Maat H, Bindi M (2010) Assessing risk and adaptation options to fires and windstorms in European forestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:681–701. doi:10.1007/s11027-010-9243-0
Schou E, Thorsen BJ, Jacobsen JB (2015) Regeneration decisions in forestry under climate change related uncertainties and risks: effects of three different aspects of uncertainty. Forest Policy Econ 50:11–19. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.006
Schwab O, Maness T, Bull G, Roberts D (2009) Modeling the effect of changing market conditions on mountain pine beetle salvage harvesting and structural changes in the British Columbia forest products industry. Can J For Res 39:1806–1820. doi:10.1139/X09-099
Schwarzbauer P, Rauch P (2013) Impact on industry and markets—roundwood prices and procurement risks. In: Gardiner B, Schuck A, Schelhaas M-J, Orazio C, Blennow K, Nicoll B (eds) Living with storm damage to forests. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 64–69
Schwarzbauer P, Weinfurter S, Stern T, Koch S (2013) Economic crises: impacts on the forest-based sector and wood-based energy use in Austria. Forest Policy Econ 27:13–22. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.11.004
Schwierz C, Köllner-Heck P, Zenklusen Mutter E, Bresch D, Vidale P-L, Wild M, Schär C (2010) Modelling European winter wind storm losses in current and future climate. Clim Chang 101:485–514. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9712-1
Segura M, Ray D, Maroto C (2014) Decision support systems for forest management: a comparative analysis and assessment. Comput Electron Agric 101:55–67. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.005
Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2013) Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. J Environ Manag 114:461–469. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.028
Spathelf P, Maaten E, Maaten-Theunissen M, Campioli M, Dobrowolska D (2014) Climate change impacts in European forests: the expert views of local observers. Ann For Sci 71:131–137. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0280-1
Stadelmann G, Bugmann H, Meier F, Wermelinger B, Bigler C (2013) Effects of salvage logging and sanitation felling on bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) infestations. For Ecol Manag 305:273–281. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.003
Subramanian N, Bergh J, Johansson U, Nilsson U, Sallnäs O (2015) Adaptation of forest management regimes in Southern Sweden to increased risks associated with climate change. Forests 7:8
Swedish Forest Agency (2006) After Gudrun. Lessons learnt following the storm in 2005 and recommendations for the future. Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping
Thom D, Seidl R, Steyrer G, Krehan H, Formayer H (2013) Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in Central European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 307:293–302. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.017
Toppinen A, Kuuluvainen J (2010) Forest sector modelling in Europe—the state of the art and future research directions. Forest Policy Econ 12:2–8. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.017
Trauman D (2002) Le retour d’expériences: outils et concepts. Ann Mines Août 2002:3–7
Usbeck T, Wohlgemuth T, Dobbertin M, Pfister C, Bürgi A, Rebetez M (2010) Increasing storm damage to forests in Switzerland from 1858 to 2007. Agric For Meteorol 150:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.010
Valinger E, Kempe G, Fridman J (2014) Forest management and forest state in southern Sweden before and after the impact of storm Gudrun in the winter of 2005. Scand J For Res 29:1–7. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.927528
van Lierop P, Lindquist E, Sathyapala S, Franceschini G (2015) Global forest area disturbance from fire, insect pests, diseases and severe weather events. For Ecol Manag 352:78–88. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.010
Veenman S, Liefferink D, Arts B (2009) A short history of Dutch forest policy: the ‘de-institutionalisation’ of a policy arrangement. Forest Policy Econ 11:202–208. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.03.001
Verkerk PJ, Levers C, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Valbuena R, Verburg PH, Zudin S (2015) Mapping wood production in European forests. For Ecol Manag 357:228–238. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.007
Wermelinger B, Duelli P, Obrist MK (2002) Dynamics of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in windthrow areas in alpine spruce forests. For Snow Landsc Res 77:133–148
Wermelinger B, Obrist MK, Baur H, Jakoby O, Duelli P (2013) Synchronous rise and fall of bark beetle and parasitoid populations in windthrow areas. Agric For Entomol 15:301–309. doi:10.1111/afe.12018
Winkel G, Sotirov M (2015) Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration. Environ Plan C. doi:10.1068/c1356j
Yousefpour R, Bredahl Jacobsen J, Thorsen BJ, Meilby H, Hanewinkel M, Oehler K (2012) A review of decision-making approaches to handle uncertainty and risk in adaptive forest management under climate change. Ann For Sci 69:1–15. doi:10.1007/s13595-011-0153-4
Yousefpour R, Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C, Hanewinkel M, Meilby H, Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ (2013) Updating beliefs and combining evidence in adaptive forest management under climate change: a case study of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) in the Black Forest, Germany. J Environ Manag 122:56–64. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.004
