Testing the redintegration hypothesis by a single probe recognition paradigm

[en] The lexicality effect in verbal short-term memory (STM), in which word lists are better recalled than nonword lists, is considered to reflect the influence of linguistic long-term memory (LTM) knowledge on verbal STM performance. The locus of this effect remains however a matter of debate. The redintegrative account considers that degrading phonological traces of memoranda are reconstructed at recall by selecting lexical LTM representations that match the phonological traces. According to a strong version of this account, redintegrative processes should be strongly reduced in recognition paradigms, leading to reduced LTM effects. We tested this prediction by contrasting word and nonword memoranda in a fast encoding probe recognition paradigm. We observed a very strong lexicality effect, with better and faster recognition performance for words as compared to nonwords. These results do not support a strong version of the redintegrative account of LTM effects in STM which considers that these LTM effects would be the exclusive product of reconstruction mechanisms. If redintegration processes intervene in STM recognition tasks, they must be very fast, which at the same time provides support for models considering direct activation of lexico-semantic knowledge during verbal STM tasks.

Research center :

PsyNCog - Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives - ULiège

Disciplines :

Theoretical & cognitive psychology

Author, co-author :

Kowialiewski, Benjamin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychopathologie cognitive

Majerus, Steve ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychopathologie cognitive

Language :

English

Title :

Testing the redintegration hypothesis by a single probe recognition paradigm

Publication date :

2018

Journal title :

Memory

ISSN :

0965-8211

eISSN :

1464-0686

Publisher :

Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom

Volume :

Pages :

1256-1264

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 10 April 2018

Statistics

Number of views

76 (10 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Acheson, D. J., & Macdonald, M. C., (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 50–68. doi: 10.1037/a0014411
Allen, R., & Hulme, C., (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 64–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.002
Bailey, H., Dunlosky, J., & Kane, M. J., (2011). Contribution of strategy use to performance on complex and simple span tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 447–461. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0034-3
Besner, D., & Davelaar, E., (1982). Basic processes in reading: Two phonological codes. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 36(4), 701–711.
Bhatarah, P., Ward, G., Smith, J., & Hayes, L., (2009). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 689–713. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.689
Bunting, M., Cowan, N., & Saults, J. S., (2006). How does running memory span work? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(10), 1691–1700. doi: 10.1080/17470210600848402
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J., (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106(3), 551–581.
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J., (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 627–652. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005
Campoy, G., Castellà, J., Provencio, V., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D., (2014). Automatic semantic encoding in verbal short-term memory: Evidence from the concreteness effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 759–778. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.966248
Cowan, Nelson., (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A., (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 42–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001
Dienes, Z., (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406920
Dienes, Z., (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(781), 1–17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
Egorova, N., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y., (2014). Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topography, 27(3), 375–392. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3
Fallon, A. B., Mak, E., Tehan, G., & Daly, C., (2005). Lexicality and phonological similarity: A challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall? Memory (Hove, England), 13(3/4), 349–356. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000215
Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W., (2002). Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology, 45(August 1997), 220–266.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M., (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000002
Guérard, K., & Saint-Aubin, J., (2012). Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 312–324. doi: 10.1037/a0025481
Gupta, Prahlad., (2009). A computational model of nonword repetition, immediate serial recall, and nonword learning. In Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain (pp. 108–135). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
Hannemann, R., Obleser, J., & Eulitz, C., (2007). Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech. Brain Research, 1153, 134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.069
Heald, S. L. M., & Nusbaum, H. C., (2014). Speech perception as an active cognitive process. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8(1), 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00035
Hockey, R., (1973). Rate of presentation in running memory and direct manipulation of input-processing strategies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(1), 104–111. doi: 10.1080/14640747308400328
Hulme, C., Maughan, S., & Brown, G. D. A., (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 685–701.
Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Brown, G., & Mercer, R., (1995). The role of long-term memory mechanisms in memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 527–536.
Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D. A., Martin, S., & Stuart, G., (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1217–1232.
Hulme, C., Stuart, G., Brown, G. D. A., & Morin, C., (2003). High- and low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 500–518. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00096-2
Jarrold, C., Cocksey, J., & Dockerill, E., (2008). Phonological similarity and lexicality effects in children’s verbal short-term memory: Concerns about the interpretation of probed recall data. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 324–340. doi: 10.1080/17470210701202210
JASP Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.1.1)[Computer software].
Jefferies, E., Frankish, C. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A., (2006a). Lexical and semantic binding in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 81–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.001
Jefferies, E., Frankish, C. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A., (2006b). Lexical and semantic influences on item and order memory in immediate serial recognition: Evidence from a novel task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 949–964. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000141
Jeffreys, H., (1998). The theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, G., & Macken, B., (2017). Long-term associative learning predicts verbal short-term memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 1–14. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0759-3
Kruschke, J. K., (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 299–312. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406925
Leonard, M. K., Baud, M. O., Sjerps, M. J., & Chang, E. F., (2016). Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex. Nature Communications, 7, 13619–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13619
Levenshtein, V. I., (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707–710.
MacGregor, L. J., Pulvermuller, F., van Casteren, M., & Shtyrov, Y., (2012). Ultra-rapid access to words in the brain. Nature Communications, 3, 281. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1715
Majerus, S., (2009). Verbal short-term memory and temporary activation of language representations: The importance of distinguishing item and order information. In Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain (pp. 244–276). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Majerus, S., (2013). Language repetition and short-term memory: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 357. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00357
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C., (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 3–29.
Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Dell, G. S., (1996). Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relation between auditory–verbal STM capacity and lexical errors in repetition. Brain and Language, 52(1), 83–113.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J., (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
McDermott, K. B., Petersen, S. E., Watson, J. M., & Ojemann, J. G., (2003). A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 293–303. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00162-8
Morrison, A. B., Rosenbaum, G. M., Fair, D., & Chein, J. M., (2016). Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory. Memory & Cognition, 44(6), 922–936. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0608-9
New, B., (2006). Lexique 3: Une nouvelle base de données lexicales. Actes de La Conférence Traitement Automatique Des Langues Naturelles.
Nimmo, L. M., & Roodenrys, S., (2005). The phonological similarity effect in serial recognition. Memory, 13(7), 773–784. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000386
Palladino, P., & Jarrold, C., (2008). Do updating tasks involve updating? Evidence from comparisons with immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 392–399. doi: 10.1080/17470210701664989
Patterson, K., Graham, N., & Hodges, J. R., (1994). The impact of semantic memory loss on phonological representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.57
Poirier, M., & Saint-Aubin, J., (2005). Word frequency effects in immediate serial recall: Item familiarity and item co-occurrence have the same effect. Memory, 13(3–4), 325–332. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000369
Pollack, I., Johnson, L. B., & Knaff, P. R., (1959). Running memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 137–146. doi: 10.1037/h0046137
Ralph, M. A. L., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T., (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 42–55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150
Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C., (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 292–323. doi: 10.1080/17470210601147747
Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Lethbridge, A., Hinton, M., & Nimmo, L. M., (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1019–1034. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1019
Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D., (2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 682–689. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7
Ruiz, R. M., Elosúa, M. R., & Lechuga, M. T., (2005). Old-fashioned responses in an updating memory task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(5), 887–908. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000395
Saint-Aubin, J., Ouellette, D., & Poirier, M., (2005). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there an effect on all trials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 171–177. doi: 10.3758/BF03196364
Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M., (2000). Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 332–340.
Schweickert, R., (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 168–175.
Schweickert, R., Chen, S., & Poirier, M., (1999). Redintegration and the useful lifetime of the verbal memory representation. International Journal of Psychology, 34(5–6), 447–453.
Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J. E., Carlyon, R. P., & Davis, M. H., (2012). Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(25), 8443–8453. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N., (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149.
Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R., (2002). Language familiarity effects in short-term memory: The role of output delay and long-term knowledge. (4), 1363–1383. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000198
Tse, C.-S., Li, Y., & Altarriba, J., (2011). The effect of semantic relatedness on immediate serial recall and serial recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(12), 2425–2437. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.604787
Turner, J. E., & Henry, L. A., (2004). Redintegration and lexicality effects in children: Do they depend upon the demands of the memory task? Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 501–510.
Wagenmakers, E.-J., (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. doi: 10.3758/BF03194105
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & Van, H., (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).
Walker, I., & Hulme, C., (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1256–1271.
Zhuang, J., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. a., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K., (2011). The interaction of lexical semantics and cohort competition in spoken word recognition: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 3778–3790. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00046
Zhuang, J., Tyler, L. K., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D., (2014). Optimally efficient neural systems for processing spoken language. Cerebral Cortex, 24(4), 908–918. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs366