Article (Scientific journals)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia
Almasri, J.; Adusumalli, J.; Asi, N. et al.
2019In Journal of Vascular Surgery, 69 (6), p. 126S-136
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
CLTI systematic review JVS.pdf
Publisher postprint (3.74 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Bypass surgery; Critical limb ischemia; Endovascular treatment; Revascularization; Severe limb ischemia; Article
Abstract :
[en] Background: The optimal strategy for revascularization in infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)remains debatable. Comparative trials are scarce, and daily decisions are often made using anecdotal or low-quality evidence. Methods: We searched multiple databases through May 7, 2017, for prospective studies with at least 1-year follow-up that evaluated patient-relevant outcomes of infrainguinal revascularization procedures in adults with CLTI. Independent pairs of reviewers selected articles and extracted data. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool outcomes across studies. Results: We included 44 studies that enrolled 8602 patients. Periprocedural outcomes (mortality, amputation, major adverse cardiac events)were similar across treatment modalities. Overall, patients with infrapopliteal disease had higher patency rates of great saphenous vein graft at 1 and 2 years (primary: 87%, 78%; secondary: 94%, 87%, respectively)compared with all other interventions. Prosthetic bypass outcomes were notably inferior to vein bypass in terms of amputation and patency outcomes, especially for below knee targets at 2 years and beyond. Drug-eluting stents demonstrated improved patency over bare-metal stents in infrapopliteal arteries (primary patency: 73% vs 50% at 1 year), and was at least comparable to balloon angioplasty (66% primary patency). Survival, major amputation, and amputation-free survival at 2 years were broadly similar between endovascular interventions and vein bypass, with prosthetic bypass having higher rates of limb loss. Overall, the included studies were at moderate to high risk of bias and the quality of evidence was low. Conclusions: There are major limitations in the current state of evidence guiding treatment decisions in CLTI, particularly for severe anatomic patterns of disease treated via endovascular means. Periprocedural (30-day)mortality, amputation, and major adverse cardiac events are broadly similar across modalities. Patency rates are highest for saphenous vein bypass, whereas both patency and limb salvage are markedly inferior for prosthetic grafting to below the knee targets. Among endovascular interventions, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and drug-eluting stents appear comparable for focal infrapopliteal disease, although no studies included long segment tibial lesions. Heterogeneity in patient risk, severity of limb threat, and anatomy treated renders direct comparison of outcomes from the current literature challenging. Future studies should incorporate both limb severity and anatomic staging to best guide clinical decision making in CLTI. © 2019
Disciplines :
Surgery
Author, co-author :
Almasri, J.;  Evidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Adusumalli, J.;  Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Asi, N.;  Evidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Lakis, S.;  Evidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Alsawas, M.;  Evidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Prokop, L. J.;  Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Bradbury, A.;  Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Kolh, Philippe  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Biochimie et physiologie générales, humaines et path.
Conte, M. S.;  Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif, United States
Murad, M. H.;  Evidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, United States
Language :
English
Title :
A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
Journal of Vascular Surgery
ISSN :
0741-5214
eISSN :
1097-6809
Publisher :
Elsevier
Volume :
69
Issue :
6
Pages :
126S-136S
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 24 September 2019

Statistics


Number of views
189 (9 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
365 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
46
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
41
OpenCitations
 
29

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi