Article (Scientific journals)
Validation of a French-language version of TeamSTEPPS® T-TPQ and T-TAQ questionnaires
Diep, Anh Nguyet; PAQUAY, Méryl; Servotte, Jean-Christophe et al.
2021In Journal of Interprofessional Care
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
TEAMSTEPPS.pdf
Publisher postprint (852.17 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Team training; patient safety; interdisciplinary; surveys; teamwork
Abstract :
[en] Teamwork training and evaluation are essential to enhance safety and quality of care. The lack of the psychometric testing of the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ) and Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) across different language and cultural settings has questioned their widespread use because such attitudes and perceptions are highly subjective and context-bound. The present study aims to translate the T-TAQ and T-TPQ into the French language and validate the psycho- metric properties of the two questionnaires in a public health context. A forward-backward translation process, panel reviewing, and pilot testing in two rounds were followed to develop the French versions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha were used to examine the factor structure and internal consistency, whereas two-way mixed Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was performed to assess test-retest reliability. A total of 235 healthcare professionals in the French-speaking community of Belgium completed the T-TAQ and T-TPQ. After two to four weeks, 102 participants took part in the second round. Despite good fit indices as revealed by the CFA and Cronbach’s alpha from 0.53 to 0.75 for the five dimensions of the T-TAQ and 0.76 to 0.79 for the T-TPQ, the squared correlations among the constructs were higher than the average variance extracted. Two-way mixed ICCs indicated fair to good test-retest reliability for all the five constructs of the two questionnaires, except the leadership scale of the T-TAQ. The French-language versions of the T-TAQ and T-TPQ were semantically equivalent and culturally relevant with adequate test-retest reliability as compared to the English versions. These two instruments might be used to capture the overall attitude toward teamwork and perceptions of team skills and behaviors. Yet, further research is advisable to refine the scales to establish the discriminant validity of the different dimensions and discriminative power of the instruments.
Disciplines :
Education & instruction
Author, co-author :
Diep, Anh Nguyet   ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Simulation en santé publique
PAQUAY, Méryl   ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Autres Services Médicaux > Service des urgences
Servotte, Jean-Christophe;  Haute Ecole Namur-Liège-Luxembourg > Cellule Recherche & Développement Centre Namur Simulation
Dardenne, Nadia  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Biostatistique
Istas, Laure;  Plateforme Pour l’Amélioration Continue de la Qualité des Soins et de la Sécurité des Patients, Brussels, Belgium
Van Ngoc, Pauline  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine générale
Charlier, Mathilde
GHUYSEN, Alexandre  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Autres Services Médicaux > Service des urgences
Donneau, Anne-Françoise  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Biostatistique
 These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Language :
English
Title :
Validation of a French-language version of TeamSTEPPS® T-TPQ and T-TAQ questionnaires
Publication date :
May 2021
Journal title :
Journal of Interprofessional Care
ISSN :
1356-1820
eISSN :
1469-9567
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 18 May 2021

Statistics


Number of views
133 (40 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
8 (7 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi