Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140106
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Attitudes of Australians with inflammatory arthritis to biologic therapy and biosimilars
Author: Quinlivan, A.
Lester, S.
Barrett, C.
Whittle, S.
Rowett, D.
Black, R.
Chand, V.
Marine, F.
March, L.
Sinnathurai, P.
Buchbinder, R.
Hill, C.
Citation: Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 2022; 6(3):rkac099-1-rkac099-7
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Issue Date: 2022
ISSN: 2514-1775
2514-1775
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Alannah Quinlivan, Susan Lester, Claire Barrett, Samuel Whittle, Debra Rowett, Rachel Black, Vibhasha Chand, Franca Marine, Lyn March, Premarani Sinnathurai, Rachelle Buchbinder and Catherine Hill
Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the knowledge and beliefs of Australian patients with inflammatory arthritis regarding biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) and biosimilars and their sources of information. Methods: Participants enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD) with RA, PsA and axial SpA were sent an online survey. They were asked about information sources for b/tsDMARDs and how positive or negative this information was. The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) was used to measure beliefs about b/tsDMARDs with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Participants were asked about their knowledge of biosimilars and willingness to switch to biosimilar. Results: There was a response rate of 66% (994/1498; 67% female, median age 62 years). Participants currently taking b/tsDMARDs (n¼794) had a high b/tsDMARD-specific BMQ ‘necessity’ score fmedian 4.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 3.6–4.8]g, with a lower specific ‘concerns’ score [median 2.4 (IQR 2.0– 3.0)]. Participants consulted multiple information sources [median 3 (IQR 2–5)]. Positive sources were rheumatologists and educational websites and negative were chat rooms and social media. Only 18% were familiar with biosimilars, with half knowing of availability in Australia. Following a short paragraph describing biosimilars, 75% (744) of participants indicated they would consider switching if recommended by their rheumatologist, with nearly half identifying safety and efficacy of biosimilars as an important concern. Conclusion: Australian patients have positive attitudes towards b/tsDMARDs overall, although little knowledge of biosimilars specifically. They have a high degree of trust in their rheumatologist regarding treatment decisions, even if they are unfamiliar with the medication recommended.
Keywords: patient attitude towards health; biologic therapies; biosimilars; RA; axial spondyloarthritis; PsA; inflammatory arthritis
Description: Advance access publication 10 November 2022
Rights: © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac099
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/384330
Published version: https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/6/3/rkac099/6820937
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_140106.pdfPublished version968.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.