Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/111306
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events
Authors: Corona-Sobrino, Carmen | García-Melón, Mónica | Poveda-Bautista, Rocio | González-Urango, Hannia
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Sociología I
Keywords: Gender gap | Academic conferences | Women | Underrepresentation | Performance indicators
Knowledge Area: Sociología
Issue Date: 7-Dec-2020
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Citation: Corona-Sobrino C, García-Melón M, Poveda-Bautista R, González-Urango H (2020) Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0243549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243549
Abstract: The importance of participation in academic conferences is well known for members of the scientific community. It is not only for the feedback and the improvement of the work, it is also about career development, building networks and increasing visibility. Nevertheless, women continue to be under-represented in these academic events and even more so in the most visible positions such as speaking roles. This paper presents the development of a tool based on performance indicators, which will allow monitoring and evaluating gender roles and inequalities in academic conferences in order to tackle the underrepresentation of women. The study identifies relevant perspectives (participation, organizational structure and attitudes) and designs specific lists of performance indicators for each of them. The tool is based on a combination of two multicriteria techniques, Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Hierarchy Process Sort, and a qualitative analysis based on in-depth interviews and information gathered from a focus group. The use of the AHP multi-criteria decision technique has allowed us to weight the indicators according to the opinion of several experts, and with them to be able to generate from these weightings composite indicators for each of the three dimensions. The most relevant indicators were for the participation dimension. Additionally, the tool developed has been applied to an academic conference which has been monitored in real time. The results are shown as a traffic light visualization approach, where red means bad performance, yellow average performance and green good performance, helping us to present the results for each indicator. Finally, proposals for improvement actions addressed to the red indicators are explained. The work carried out highlights the need to broaden the study of gender equality in academic conferences, not only regarding the participation but also the performance of different roles and functions.
Sponsor: Grant Number OR2019-60221 Funder: Open Society Foundations Programme: Open Society Initiative for Europe Award: Expanding the Female Talent Pipeline in Europe https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/111306
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243549
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2020 Corona-Sobrino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243549
Appears in Collections:Personal Investigador sin Adscripción a Grupo
INV - OBSOEDU - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailCorona-Sobrino_etal_2020_PLoS-ONE.pdf1,94 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons