Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/119670
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review
Autor/es: Mena-Guevara, Kevin J. | Piñero, David P. | Fez Saiz, Dolores de
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Palabras clave: Visual function | App | Electronic device | Visual acuity | Tablet | Contrast sensitivity
Área/s de conocimiento: Óptica
Fecha de publicación: 24-nov-2021
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Mena-Guevara KJ, Piñero DP, de Fez D. Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review. Vision. 2021; 5(4):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5040058
Resumen: The current review aimed to collect and critically analyze the scientific peer-reviewed literature that is available about the use of digital applications for evaluation of visual parameters in electronic devices (tablets and smartphones), confirming if there are studies calibrating and validating each of these applications. Three bibliographic search engines (using the search equation described in the paper) and the Mendeley reference manager search engine were used to complete the analysis. Only articles written in English and that are evaluating the use of tests in healthy patients to measure or characterize any visual function aspects using tablets or smartphones were included. Articles using electronic visual tests to assess the results of surgical procedures or are conducted in pathological conditions were excluded. A total of 19 articles meeting these inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally analyzed. One critical point of all these studies is that there was no mention of the characterization (spatial and/or colorimetrical) of screens and the stimuli used in most of them. Only two studies described some level of calibration of the digital device before the beginning of the study. Most revised articles described non-controlled comparatives studies (73.7%), reporting some level of scientific evidence on the validation of tools, although more consistent studies are needed.
Patrocinador/es: The author David P. Piñero has been supported by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness of Spain within the program Ramón y Cajal, RYC-2016-20471.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/119670
ISSN: 2411-5150
DOI: 10.3390/vision5040058
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5040058
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailMena-Guevara_etal_2021_Vision.pdf600,55 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons