Analysis of the process of representing clinical statements for decision-support applications: a comparison of openEHR archetypes and HL7 virtual medical record
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: González-Ferrer, A.; Peleg, M.; Marcos, Mar; Maldonado, Jose Alberto
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7036
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8620
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Analysis of the process of representing clinical statements for decision-support applications: a comparison of openEHR archetypes and HL7 virtual medical recordFecha de publicación
2016Editor
SpringerISSN
0148-5598; 1573-689XCita bibliográfica
GONZÁLEZ-FERRER, A., et al. Analysis of the process of representing clinical statements for decision-support applications: a comparison of openEHR archetypes and HL7 virtual medical record. Journal of medical systems, 2016, vol. 40, no 7, p. 1-10.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10916-016-0524-3Palabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Delivering patient-specific decision-support based on computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) requires mapping CIG clinical statements (data items, clinical recommendations) into patients’ data. This is most effectively ... [+]
Delivering patient-specific decision-support based on computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) requires mapping CIG clinical statements (data items, clinical recommendations) into patients’ data. This is most effectively done via intermediate data schemas, which enable querying the data according to the semantics of a shared standard intermediate schema. This study aims to evaluate the use of HL7 virtual medical record (vMR) and openEHR archetypes as intermediate schemas for capturing clinical statements from CIGs that are mappable to electronic health records (EHRs) containing patient data and patient-specific recommendations. Using qualitative research methods, we analyzed the encoding of ten representative clinical statements taken from two CIGs used in real decision-support systems into two health information models (openEHR archetypes and HL7 vMR instances) by four experienced informaticians. Discussion among the modelers about each case study example greatly increased our understanding of the capabilities of these standards, which we share in this educational paper. Differing in content and structure, the openEHR archetypes were found to contain a greater level of representational detail and structure while the vMR representations took fewer steps to complete. The use of openEHR in the encoding of CIG clinical statements could potentially facilitate applications other than decision-support, including intelligent data analysis and integration of additional properties of data items from existing EHRs. On the other hand, due to their smaller size and fewer details, the use of vMR potentially supports quicker mapping of EHR data into clinical statements. [-]
Publicado en
Journal of medical systems, 2016, vol. 40, no 7Derechos de acceso
© Springer International Publishing
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- ICC_Articles [414]