Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/258148
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Analysis of immune responses to attenuated alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 formulated with and without adjuvant

AutorRussel, George C.; Haig, David M.; Dagleish, M.P.; Todd, Helen; Percival, Ann; Grant, D.M.; Thomson, Jackie; Karagianni, Anna E.; Benavides, Julio CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveMalignant catarrhal fever
Vaccine
Emulsigen
Inactivation
Antigens
Antibodies
Fecha de publicación2021
EditorElsevier
CitaciónVaccine: X 8: 100090 (2021)
ResumenThe experimental vaccine for bovine malignant catarrhal fever consists of viable attenuated alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1) derived‘ by extensive culture passage, combined with an oil-in-water adjuvant, delivered intramuscularly. This immunisation strategy was over 80% effective in previous experimental and field trials and protection appeared to be associated with induction of virus-neutralising antibodies. Whether the vaccine virus is required to be viable at the point of immunisation and whether adjuvant is required to induce the appropriate immune responses remains unclear. To address these issues two studies were performed, firstly to analyse immune responses in the presence and absence of adjuvant and secondly, to investigate immune responses to vaccines containing adjuvant plus viable or inactivated AlHV-1. The first study showed that viable attenuated AlHV-1 in the absence of adjuvant induced virus-specific antibodies but the titres of virus-neutralising antibodies were significantly lower than those induced by vaccine containing viable virus and adjuvant, suggesting adjuvant was required for optimal responses. In contrast, the second study found that the vaccine containing inactivated (>99.9%) AlHV-1 induced similar levels of virus-neutralising antibody to the equivalent formulation containing viable AlHV-1. Together these studies suggest that the MCF vaccine acts as an antigen depot for induction of immune responses, requiring adjuvant and a suitable antigen source, which need not be viable virus. These obser- vations may help in directing the development of alternative MCF vaccine formulations for distribution in the absence of an extensive cold chain.
Descripción7 páginas, 3 figuras, 4 tablas.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100090
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/258148
DOI10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100090
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100090
issn: 2590-1362
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGM) Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Russell, G. C._ Analysis_Vaccine_ X 2021.pdf644,1 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

2
checked on 23-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on 12-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on 16-may-2024

Download(s)

52
checked on 16-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons