Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/267536
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Microalgae colonization of different microplastic polymers in experimental mesocosms across an environmental gradient

AutorNava, Veronica; Matias, Miguel G.; Castillo-Escrivà, Andreu; Messyasz, Beata; Leoni, Barbara
Palabras claveBiofouling
Epiplastic community
Periphyton
Phytobenthos
Plastic colonization
Plastisphere
Fecha de publicaciónfeb-2022
EditorJohn Wiley & Sons
CitaciónGlobal Change Biology 28: 1402–1413 (2022)
ResumenA variety of organisms can colonize microplastic surfaces through biofouling processes. Heterotrophic bacteria tend to be the focus of plastisphere research; however, the presence of epiplastic microalgae within the biofilm has been repeatedly documented. Despite the relevance of biofouling in determining the fate and effects of microplastics in aquatic systems, data about this process are still scarce, especially for freshwater ecosystems. Here, our goal was to evaluate the biomass develop-ment and species composition of biofilms on different plastic polymers and to in-vestigate whether plastic substrates exert a strong enough selection to drive species sorting, overcoming other niche-defining factors. We added microplastic pellets of high- density polyethylene (HDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and a mix of the two polymers in 15 lentic mesocosms in five different locations of the Iberian Peninsula, and after one month, we evaluated species composition and biomass of microalgae developed on plastic surfaces. Our results, based on 45 samples, showed that colonization of plastic surfaces occurred in a range of lentic ecosystems covering a wide geographical gradient and different environmental conditions (e.g., nutrient concentration, conductivity, macrophyte coverage). We highlighted that total bio-mass differed based on the polymer considered, with higher biomass developed on PET substrate compared to HDPE. Microplastics supported the growth of a rich and diversified community of microalgae (242 species), with some cosmopolite species. However, we did not observe species-specificity in the colonization of the different plastic polymers. Local species pool and nutrient concentration rather than polymeric composition seemed to be the determinant factor defying the community diversity. Regardless of specific environmental conditions, we showed that many species could coexist on the surface of relatively small plastic items, highlighting how microplastics may have considerable carrying capacity, with possible consequences on the wider ecological context.
Versión del editorhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcb.15989
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/267536
DOI10.1111/gcb.15989
ISSN1354-1013
E-ISSN1365-2486
Aparece en las colecciones: (MNCN) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Matías_M_Microalgae.pdfArtículo principal1,44 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on 20-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

138
checked on 30-abr-2024

Download(s)

100
checked on 30-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons