Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/282461
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Discovering oxidative potential (OP) drivers of atmospheric PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 simultaneously in North-Eastern Spain

AutorIn 't Veld, Marten CSIC ORCID; Pandolfi, Marco CSIC ORCID; Amato, Fulvio CSIC ORCID ; Pérez, Noemí CSIC ORCID; Reche, Cristina CSIC ORCID; Dominutti, P.; Jaffrezo, J.; Alastuey, Andrés CSIC ORCID; Querol, Xavier CSIC ORCID ; Uzu, G.
Palabras claveSource apportionment
Oxidative potential
PM(1)
PM(10)
PM(2.5)
Positive matrix factorization
Fecha de publicación12-oct-2022
EditorElsevier
CitaciónScience of The Total Environment 857, Part 2: 159386 (2023)
ResumenAmbient particulate matter (PM) is a major contributor to air pollution, leading to adverse health effects on the human population. It has been suggested that the oxidative potential (OP, as a tracer of oxidative stress) of PM is a possible determinant of its health impact. In this study, samples of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 were collected roughly every four days from January 2018 until March 2019 at a Barcelona urban background site and Montseny rural background site in northeastern Spain. We determined the chemical composition of samples, allowing us to perform source apportionment using positive matrix factorization. The OP of PM was determined by measuring reactive oxygen species using dithiothreitol and ascorbic acid assays. Finally, to link the sources with the measured OP, both a Pearson's correlation and a multiple linear regression model were applied to the dataset. The results showed that in Barcelona, the OP of PM10 was much higher than those of PM2.5 and PM1, whereas in Montseny results for all PM sizes were in the same range, but significantly lower than in Barcelona. In Barcelona, several anthropogenic sources were the main drivers of OP in PM10 (Combustion + Road Dust + Heavy Oil + OC-rich) and PM2.5 (Road Dust + Combustion). In contrast, PM1 -associated OP was driven by Industry, with a much lower contribution to PM10 and PM2.5 mass. Meanwhile, Montseny exhibited no clear drivers for OP evolution, likely explaining the lack of a significant difference in OP between PM10, PM2.5, and PM1. Overall, this study indicates that size fraction matters for OP, as a function of the environment typology. In an urban context, OP is driven by the PM10 and PM1 size fractions, whereas only the PM1 fraction is involved in rural environments.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159386
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/282461
DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159386
ISSN00489697
Aparece en las colecciones: (IDAEA) Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
1-s2.0-S0048969722064853-main.pdfArtículo principal4,81 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
1-s2.0-S0048969722064853-mmc1.docxMaterial suplementario3,04 MBMicrosoft Word XMLVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on 22-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

27
checked on 27-may-2024

Download(s)

110
checked on 27-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.