Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/295361
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Single or repeated immunization against GnRH fails to completely abolish spermatogenesis in dwarf bucks (Capra hircus)

AutorGiriboni, Julia; Martínez-Nevado, Eva; García, Juncal; Velázquez, Rosario; Toledano-Díaz, A. CSIC ORCID ; Ungerfeld, Rodolfo; Santiago Moreno, Julián
Palabras claveGnRH vaccine
Male contraception
Reproductive control
Fecha de publicación14-oct-2022
EditorJohn Wiley & Sons
CitaciónZoo Biology (2022)
ResumenIn both captive wildlife and production animals is important to develop strategies for population control. Immunization against GnRH is an easy and inexpensive immunocastration method that reduces the concentration of testosterone and decreases sperm quality. However, its effectiveness depends on the species and repetition of the treatment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a single treatment (initial immunization plus a booster with Improvac) vs repeated treatment (six doses of Improvac) to inhibit testicular function and maintain the contraceptive status during long periods in bucks. Three Dwarf bucks (Capra hircus) received two doses of Improvac, the first on Week 0, and the booster 4 weeks later (single immunization, group SI) while three Dwarf bucks received one dose of Improvac every 6 months during 3 consecutive years (repeated immunization, group RI). The other three Dwarf bucks remained untreated (control bucks, group CON). Bucks from RI had a greater decrease in scrotal circumference, testosterone concentration, male odor intensity, and sperm quality than SI bucks. However, there were no differences between SI and CON bucks in any of the variables studied. Overall, repeated treatment of Improvac decreased the testicular function of Dwarf bucks, although did not produce complete infertility. However, the repetition of the treatment produced more intensive negative effects, indicating that the strength of the effects of Improvac is rapidly lost in bucks.
Descripción7 Pág. Departamento de Reproducción Animal​
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21743
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/295361
DOI10.1002/zoo.21743
ISSN1098-2361
E-ISSN0733-3188
Aparece en las colecciones: (INIA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
NO_DISPONIBLE.pdfArchivo comodín. No disponible el PDF59,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on 03-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

33
checked on 10-may-2024

Download(s)

51
checked on 10-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.