Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3950
Título: Portuguese Version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: a Multicenter Validation Study
Autor: Azevedo, LF
Sampaio, R
Dias, C
Romão, J
Lemos, L
Agualusa, L
Vaz-Serra, S
Patto, T
Costa-Pereira, A
Castro-Lopes, JM
Palavras-chave: HSAC ANS
Adult
Aged
Female
Male
Humans
Chronic Pain / diagnosis*
Chronic Pain / epidemiology*
Chronic Pain / psychology
Culture
Middle Aged
Longitudinal Studies
Pain Measurement / methods
Pain Measurement / standards*
Pain Perception / physiology
Portugal / epidemiology
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translations*
Data: 2017
Editora: Wiley
Citação: Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):808-819.
Resumo: Background: We aimed to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBPI) for the European Portuguese language and chronic pain population. Methods: This is a longitudinal multicenter validation study. A Portuguese version of the PBPI (PBPI-P) was created through a process of translation, back translation, and expert panel evaluation. The PBPI-P was administered to a total of 122 patients from 13 chronic pain clinics in Portugal, at baseline and after 7 days. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by Cronbach's alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct (convergent and discriminant) validity was assessed based on a set of previously developed theoretical hypotheses about interrelations between the PBPI-P and other measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the theoretical structure of the PBPI-P. Results: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability coefficients for each respective subscale were α = 0.620 and ICC = 0.801 for mystery; α = 0.744 and ICC = 0.841 for permanence; α = 0.778 and ICC = 0.791 for constancy; and α = 0.764 and ICC = 0.881 for self-blame. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure (performance, constancy, self-blame, and mystery) that explained 63% of the variance. The construct validity of the PBPI-P was shown to be adequate, with more than 90% of the previously defined hypotheses regarding interrelations with other measures confirmed. Conclusion: The PBPI-P has been shown to be adequate and to have excellent reliability, internal consistency, and validity. It may contribute to a better pain assessment and is suitable for research and clinical use.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3950
DOI: 10.1111/papr.12529.
Aparece nas colecções:ANS - Artigos

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Pain Pract 2017.pdf468,24 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.