Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/64591
Título: Economic costs of invasive non-native species in urban areas: an underexplored financial drain
Autor: Heringer, Gustavo
Fernandez, Romina D.
Bang, Alok
Cordonnier, Marion
Novoa, Ana
Lenzner, Bernd
Capinha, César
Renault, David
Roiz, David
Moodley, Desika
Tricarico, Elena
Holenstein, Kathrin
Kourantidou, Melina
Kirichenko, Natalia I.
Adelino, José Ricardo Pires
Dimarco, Romina D.
Bodey, Thomas W.
Watari, Yuya
Courchamp, Franck
Palavras-chave: Anthropogenic activity
Biological invasion
Economic impact
Urban ecosystem
Urbanization
InvaCost
Data: 2024
Editora: Elsevier
Citação: Heringer, G., Fernandez, R. D., Bang, A., Cordonnier, M., Novoa, A., Lenzner, B., Capinha, C. … Courchamp,F. (2024). Economic costs of invasive non-native species in urban areas: An underexplored financial drain. Science of The Total Environment, 917, 170336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170336
Resumo: Urbanization is an important driver of global change associated with a set of environmental modifications that affect the introduction and distribution of invasive non-native species (species with populations transported by humans beyond their natural biogeographic range that established and are spreading in their introduced range; hereafter, invasive species). These species are recognized as a cause of large ecological and economic losses. Nevertheless, the economic impacts of these species in urban areas are still poorly understood. Here we present a synthesis of the reported economic costs of invasive species in urban areas using the global InvaCost database, and demonstrate that costs are likely underestimated. Sixty-one invasive species have been reported to cause a cumulative cost of US$ 326.7 billion in urban areas between 1965 and 2021 globally (average annual cost of US$ 5.7 billion). Class Insecta was responsible for >99 % of reported costs (US$ 324.4 billion), followed by Aves (US$ 1.4 billion), and Magnoliopsida (US$ 494 million). The reported costs were highly uneven with the sum of the five costliest species representing 80 % of reported costs. Most reported costs were a result of damage (77.3 %), principally impacting public and social welfare (77.9 %) and authorities-stakeholders (20.7 %), and were almost entirely in terrestrial environments (99.9 %). We found costs reported for 24 countries. Yet, there are 73 additional countries with no reported costs, but with occurrences of invasive species that have reported costs in other countries. Although covering a relatively small area of the Earth’s surface, urban areas represent about 15 % of the total reported costs attributed to invasive species. These results highlight the conservative nature of the estimates and impacts, revealing important biases present in the evaluation and publication of reported data on costs. We emphasize the urgent need for more focused assessments of invasive species’ economic impacts in urban areas.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/64591
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170336
ISSN: 0048-9697
Versão do Editor: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724004716?via%3Dihub
Aparece nas colecções:IGOT - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Heringer_..._Capinha_et al_2024.pdf5,75 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.