Towards a logic of argumentation

Amgoud, L; Prade, H

Towards a logic of argumentation

Amgoud, L Prade, H

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2012, 7520 LNAI pp. 558 - 565
Issue Date:: 2012-10-23

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2013007888OK.pdf	Published version	273.52 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Amgoud, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Prade, H https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4586-8527	en_US
dc.date.issued	2012-10-23	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2012, 7520 LNAI pp. 558 - 565	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9783642333613	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0302-9743	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32907
dc.description.abstract	Starting from a typology of argumentative forms proposed in linguistics by Apothéloz, and observing that the four basic forms can be organized in a square of oppositions, we present a logical language, somewhat inspired from generalized possibilistic logic, where these basic forms can be expressed. We further analyze the interplay between the formulas of this language by means of two hexagons of oppositions. We then outline the inference machinery underlying this logic, and discuss its interest for argumentation. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_43	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Artificial Intelligence & Image Processing	en_US
dc.title	Towards a logic of argumentation	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	7520 LNAI	en_US
utslib.for	0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing	en_US
utslib.for	0802 Computation Theory and Mathematics	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CAI - Centre for Artificial Intelligence
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	7520 LNAI	en_US

Abstract:

Starting from a typology of argumentative forms proposed in linguistics by Apothéloz, and observing that the four basic forms can be organized in a square of oppositions, we present a logical language, somewhat inspired from generalized possibilistic logic, where these basic forms can be expressed. We further analyze the interplay between the formulas of this language by means of two hexagons of oppositions. We then outline the inference machinery underlying this logic, and discuss its interest for argumentation. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32907