Kötéltánc
Megjelenés dátuma: 2021
Kulcsszó: kereszténység
Alkotmánybíróság
Emberi Jogok Európai Bírósága
Alkotmánybíróság
Emberi Jogok Európai Bírósága
Abstract:
Since the Fundamental Law came into effect (and since its seventh amendment), social
and professional debates have been widespread whether the Constitutional Court's
requirement of state neutrality has changed. Although professional debates have since
seemed to subside, the IX. Amendment of the Fundamental Law may revive the
discourse on the inclusion of Christianity and its value system in the constitution.
Article XIV (1) (second sentence) of the Constitution:
„Hungary ... shall ensure an upbringing for them that is in accordance with the
values based on the constitutional identity and Christian culture of our country.”
Passages that refer to Christianity are interpreted not only by political enthusiasts but
also by jurists as phrases representing exclusively European culture and have no
religious significance. These portions of religion, which has become part of the culture,
can become that tightrope to walk for countries wishing to vindicate Christian traditions
without breaching the rights to religious freedom, the requirement of equality, the
freedom of expression, and ideological neutrality.
My paper attempts to draw the magins of the government- through the analysis of the
practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human
Rights -in how to validate and protect a culture that isn't Christianity anymore, but it is
originated from it.