Margaret Atwood: Words and the wilderness
View/Open
Date
1992Author
Evans, F.E.M.
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis is a study of several texts written by
Margaret Atwood, and is motivated by a desire to
demonstrate the polysemous irreducibi1ity of literary
meaning and to suggest ways in which critical theory and
textual practice may meaningfully interact and
correspond.
*
The first chapter examines poems in The Circle Game
in order to observe how Atwood*s persistent scrutiny of
the constitution of images creates a world almost
entirely detached from a consciousness of time and
history, and considers how this generates a radical split
between textual self-sufficiency and the psychic
wilderness through which the poems move. Here we can see
Atwood deploying language in a pared-down, restrictive
manner that circulates through the book with particular
tension. The second chapter studies her first novel The
Edible Woman. and attempts to trace through analysis of
its linguistic patterns, how Margaret Atwood controls her
subject matter and deploys her chosen narrative form in a
way that expresses the conflict between consumption and
production which is embodied in the novel's ^architectonic
♦
symbol. Moving through a specific historical period, her
characters struggle to achieve self-definition and
linguistic mastery of their environment.
The third chapter is concerned with her critical
study of Canadian literature, Survival. and the
relational framework it suggests between Canada's uneasy post-colonial status, the writer's expressive0
predicament, and the universal experience of
victimisation. Consideration is given to aspects of
Atwood's political and social philosophy, and comparison
made between her conclusions and those of other
contemporary Canadian writers.
The -fourth chapter delineates how pertinent aspects ^ %
%
of the history and historiography of seventeenth century
New England are woven into the design and purpose of The
Handmaid's Tale. The chapter examines how her period of
%
study at Harvard under Perry Miller wsaiS here used by
Atwood to elaborate an increasingly sophisticated
perspective on the struggle between the actions of the
individual and the determinations of the broader
political community.