Meijl, Toon van
Description
This study examines the implications of the paradoxes evoked by the coexistence
of a discourse of development and a discourse of tradition among the Tainui Maori
on the North Island of New Zealand. In the early 1980s the Tainui people launched
a comprehensive development programme aiming chiefly at regaining the political,
economic and cultural autonomy which they lost in the course of colonial history.
As a result of Maori encapsulation within the New Zealand liberal-democratic
welfare...[Show more] state the Tainui people are compelled to justify their aspiration to selfdetermination
in a culturally specific manner. Since the sharing of a common
colonial past plays an important role in uniting Tainui and other Maori people vis-avis
their European counterparts, the desire to manage and control tribal
development autonomously is validated by means of a discourse of tradition. Thus
tradition is not only reified, but, paradoxically, its objectification and
reinterpretation takes place principally in opposition to a stereotypical
representation of European values, largely because a major goal of the discourse of
tradition is to counter European domination. A second paradox of the counterhegemonic
reification of tradition is that it serves as a symbol of Maori survival and
continuity in order to discontinue and transform their contemporary predicament.
The representation of Maori traditions as timeless treasures thus defies change in
order to bring about change. I focus the analysis of the mediation between the discourse of development and
the discourse of tradition on the discrepancy between positive affirmations of
tradition in inter-ethnic discourse and the internal contestation and negation of
Maori tradition by factions who can no longer identify in terms of the tradition
oriented model for a Maori identity. I examine the ideological motivation of the
discourse of tradition by situating the aims and objectives of the discourse of
development in a historical perspective. The history of Maori dispossession and
confiscations of vast areas of land from the Tainui people in particular, explains the
present political aim of recovery of the lost ground, literally and metaphorically.
On the basis of the analysis of the political paradoxes of timeless traditions I argue
that the notion of tradition must no longer be viewed in a dichotomy with
modernity, as something which can only be lost and not retained in a modified
form. The understanding that traditions can be highly dynamic leads me to
advocate a dialectical perspective on social change in colonial histories, as not
simply the result of the imposition of external forces, but also consequent upon
indigenous interaction, initiatives and interpretations, even though ultimately
constrained by colonial predominance. This, in turn, causes me to review the
concept of ideology and redefine it in a broad manner, both to reject functionalist
notions of ideology and to enhance its analytical value, as well as to deepen the
understanding of the role of ideology in emic and etic accounts of social change.
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.