Responsible procreation - co-responsibility of spouses from adequate anthropology to the legal anthropology of matrimony
Authors:
- Andrzej Pastwa
Abstract
This study successfully verifies the thesis that both eponymous anthropological criteria (responsible procreation and co-responsibility of spouses), referring to the nature of personae humanae, have an invaluable epistemological value in the matrimonial law. Opening a wider horizon of cognition and interpretation, they become indispensable in the accurate/ reliable deciding of cases concerning the invalidity of marriage. The subsequent stages of the discourse proposed here, step by step from the general guidelines of adequate anthropology to the detailed assumptions of the legal anthropology of matrimony, have very clearly confirmed the words of John Paul II that “[…] an authentically juridical consideration of marriage requires a metaphysical vision of the human person and of the conjugal relationship” (Address to the Roman Rota, 2004).
- Record ID
- USL830c6fc9b5af442f9e3e8c3187b7df65
- Author
- Other language title versions
- Procreazione responsabile - coresponsabilità degli sposi Dall’antropologia adeguata all’antropologia giuridica del matrimonio
- Journal series
- Philosphy and canon law, ISSN 2450-4955, e-ISSN 2451-2141
- Issue year
- 2020
- Vol
- 6
- Pages
- 37-55
- Publication size in sheets
- 0.90
- Keywords in English
- institution of matrimony, heological doctrine de matrimonio, adequate anthropology, legal anthropology of matrimony, responsible procreation, co-responsibility of spouses
- Abstract in Polish
- Sommario Il presente studio verifica la tesi che entrambi i criteri antropologici inclusi nel titolo (procreazione responsabile,corresponsabilità degli sposi), riferiti alla natura di personae humanae, hanno un valore epistemologico inestimabile nel diritto matrimoniale. Questo perché aprendo un orizzonte cognitivo e interpretativo più ampio, sono oggi indispensabili nella valutazione giuridica corretta / attendibile nei casi di nullità di matrimonio. Le parti successive del discorso qui proposto - passo dopo passo - dagli orientamenti generali di un’antropologia adeguata agli assunti dettagliati dell’antropologia giuridica del matrimonio, hanno chiaramente confermato le parole di Giovanni Paolo II che «[...] un’analisi veramente giuridica del matrimonio deve essere basata su una visione metafisica dell’uomo e del vincolo matrimoniale» (Discorso alla Rota Romana, 2004).
- DOI
- DOI:10.31261/PaCL.2020.06.03 Opening in a new tab
- Handle.net URL
- hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/22530 Opening in a new tab
- Language
- eng (en) English
- File
-
- File: 1
- Responsible procreation - co-responsibility of spouses from adequate anthropology to the legal anthropology of matrimony, File Pastwa_responsible_procreation_co_responsibility.pdf / 543 KB
- Pastwa_responsible_procreation_co_responsibility.pdf
- publication date: 06-02-2024
- Responsible procreation - co-responsibility of spouses from adequate anthropology to the legal anthropology of matrimony, File Pastwa_responsible_procreation_co_responsibility.pdf / 543 KB
-
- Score (nominal)
- 40
- Score source
- journalList
- Score
- = 40.0, 11-12-2022, ArticleFromJournal
- Uniform Resource Identifier
- https://opus.us.edu.pl/info/article/USL830c6fc9b5af442f9e3e8c3187b7df65/
- URN
urn:uni-kat-prod:USL830c6fc9b5af442f9e3e8c3187b7df65
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis, and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or PerishOpening in a new tab system.