User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

The abundance and pollen foraging behaviour of bumble bees in relation to population size of whortleberry (vaccinium uliginosum)

  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 312.21 K
  1. Kremen Claire, Ricketts Taylor, Global Perspectives on Pollination Disruptions, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00013.x
  2. Fahrig Lenore, Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
  3. Tscharntke Teja, Brandl Roland, PLANT-INSECTINTERACTIONS INFRAGMENTEDLANDSCAPES, 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123339
  4. Menz Myles H.M., Phillips Ryan D., Winfree Rachael, Kremen Claire, Aizen Marcelo A., Johnson Steven D., Dixon Kingsley W., Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms, 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.006
  5. Aizen Marcelo A., Harder Lawrence D., EXPANDING THE LIMITS OF THE POLLEN-LIMITATION CONCEPT: EFFECTS OF POLLEN QUANTITY AND QUALITY, 10.1890/06-1017
  6. T Lennartsson, Ecology, 83, 3060 (2002)
  7. KOLB ANNETTE, Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herbPhyteuma spicatum : Fragmentation and fitness inPhyteuma spicatum, 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01049.x
  8. Cheptou Pierre-Olivier, Avendaño V Lyz G., Pollination processes and the Allee effect in highly fragmented populations: consequences for the mating system in urban environments, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01880.x
  9. BJ Rathcke, Curr Sci, 65, 273 (1993)
  10. LF Harris, Int J Trop Insect Sci, 24, 29 (2004)
  11. Biesmeijer J. C., Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands, 10.1126/science.1127863
  12. Müller Andreas, Diener Stefan, Schnyder Simone, Stutz Katharina, Sedivy Claudio, Dorn Silvia, Quantitative pollen requirements of solitary bees: Implications for bee conservation and the evolution of bee–flower relationships, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.023
  13. Westphal Catrin, Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf, Tscharntke Teja, Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence, 10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6
  14. Rodríguez-Gironés Miguel A., Bosch Jordi, Effects of body size and sociality on the anti-predator behaviour of foraging bees, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19473.x
  15. Gathmann Achim, Tscharntke Teja, Foraging ranges of solitary bees, 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00641.x
  16. Greenleaf Sarah S., Williams Neal M., Winfree Rachael, Kremen Claire, Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size, 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9
  17. Aguilar Ramiro, Ashworth Lorena, Galetto Leonardo, Aizen Marcelo Adrian, Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x
  18. Bruna Emilio M., Fiske Ian J., Trager Matthew D., Habitat fragmentation and plant populations: is what we know demographically irrelevant?, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01060.x
  19. Cane James H., Minckley Robert L., Kervin Linda J., Roulston T'ai H., Williams Neal M., Complex Responses Within A Desert Bee Guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) To Urban Habitat Fragmentation, 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0632:crwadb]2.0.co;2
  20. Goverde M., Schweizer K., Baur B., Erhardt A., Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslands, 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00194-x
  21. Bernhardt Christopher E., Mitchell Randall J., Michaels Helen J., Effects of Population Size and Density on Pollinator Visitation, Pollinator Behavior, and Pollen Tube Abundance inLupinus perennis, 10.1086/589698
  22. Andrieu Emilie, Dornier Antoine, Rouifed Soraya, Schatz Bertrand, Cheptou Pierre-Olivier, The town Crepis and the country Crepis: How does fragmentation affect a plant–pollinator interaction?, 10.1016/j.actao.2008.07.002
  23. Goulson Dave, Lye Gillian C., Darvill Ben, Diet breadth, coexistence and rarity in bumblebees, 10.1007/s10531-008-9428-y
  24. Bournérias M (2001) Guide des groupements végétaux de la région parisienne. Paris, France: Belin. 640 p.
  25. Cristofoli Sara, Monty Arnaud, Mahy Grégory, Historical landscape structure affects plant species richness in wet heathlands with complex landscape dynamics, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.014
  26. A-L Jacquemart, 84, 771 (1996)
  27. Jacquemart Anne-Laure, Floral visitors of Vaccinium species in the High Ardennes, Belgium, 10.1016/s0367-2530(17)32276-4
  28. Jacquemart A-L (1993) Écologie du système réproducteur chez trois espèces du Vaccinium en haute Ardenne [PhD Thesis]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Catholic University of Louvain.
  29. Holzschuh Andrea, Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf, Tscharntke Teja, How do landscape composition and configuration, organic farming and fallow strips affect the diversity of bees, wasps and their parasitoids?, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01642.x
  30. Moilanen Atte, Nieminen Marko, SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:scmise]2.0.co;2
  31. Minckley Robert L., Wcislo William T., Yanega Douglas, Buchmann Stephen L., Behavior and Phenology of a Specialist Bee (Dieunomia) and Sunflower (Helianthus) Pollen Availability, 10.2307/1937464
  32. Benton T (2006) Bumblebees, the natural history and identification of the species found in Britain. London: Harper Collins Publisher. 580 p.
  33. Muller Andreas, Host-Plant Specialization in Western Palearctic Anthidine Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Megachilidae), 10.2307/2963476
  34. SIPES SEDONIA D., TEPEDINO VINCENT J., Pollen-host specificity and evolutionary patterns of host switching in a clade of specialist bees (Apoidea: Diadasia) : HOST-CHOICE EVOLUTION IN A CLADE OF SPECIALIST BEES, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00544.x
  35. P Westrich, Linzer biologische Beiträge, 18, 341 (1986)
  36. Dafni A, Kevan P, Husband BC (2005) Practical pollination biology. Cambridge, Ontario, Canada: Enviroquest Ltd. 590 p. Available:http://www.cababstractsplus.org/abstracts/Abstract.aspx?AcNo=20053155384. Accessed 5 August 2010.
  37. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot, Colorado: University Press of Colorado. 583 p.
  38. van de Pol Martijn, Wright Jonathan, A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.006
  39. Hurlbert Stuart H., Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments, 10.2307/1942661
  40. Zuur Alain F., Ieno Elena N., Walker Neil, Saveliev Anatoly A., Smith Graham M., Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, ISBN:9780387874579, 10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
  41. Bolker Benjamin M., Brooks Mollie E., Clark Connie J., Geange Shane W., Poulsen John R., Stevens M. Henry H., White Jada-Simone S., Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
  42. Ferrari Silvia, Cribari-Neto Francisco, Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions, 10.1080/0266476042000214501
  43. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. p. Available:http://www.R-project.org.
  44. Aizen Marcelo A., Feinsinger Peter, Habitat Fragmentation, Native Insect Pollinators, and Feral Honey Bees in Argentine 'Chaco Serrano', 10.2307/1941941
  45. Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf, Importance of Habitat Area and Landscape Context for Species Richness of Bees and Wasps in Fragmented Orchard Meadows, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01575.x
  46. Brückmann Sabrina V., Krauss Jochen, Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf, Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes : Connectivity effects on species richness, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01828.x
  47. Goulson Dave, Rayner Pippa, Dawson Bob, Darvill Ben, Translating research into action; bumblebee conservation as a case study : Bumblebee conservation as a case study, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01929.x
  48. Donaldson John, Nanni Ingrid, Zachariades Costas, Kemper Jessica, Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Pollinator Diversity and Plant Reproductive Success in Renosterveld Shrublands of South Africa, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99515.x
  49. Brosi Berry J., Daily Gretchen C., Shih Tiffany M., Oviedo Federico, Durán Guillermo, The effects of forest fragmentation on bee communities in tropical countryside : Bee communities and tropical forest fragmentation, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01412.x
  50. Taki Hisatomo, Viana Blandina F., Kevan Peter G., Silva Fabiana O., Buck Matthias, Does forest loss affect the communities of trap-nesting wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in forests? Landscape vs. local habitat conditions, 10.1007/s10841-006-9058-1
  51. Williams Neal M., Crone Elizabeth E., Roulston T’ai H., Minckley Robert L., Packer Laurence, Potts Simon G., Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024
  52. Kreyer Daria, Oed Alexander, Walther-Hellwig Kerstin, Frankl Robert, Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae), 10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00182-4
  53. Mustajarvi Kaisa, Siikamaki Pirkko, Rytkonen Saara, Lammi Antti, Consequences of plant population size and density for plant-pollinator interactions and plant performance, 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00521.x
  54. Taki Hisatomo, Kevan Peter G., Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant–pollinator interactions? Preliminary findings, 10.1007/s10531-007-9168-4
  55. Franzén Markus, Larsson Magnus, Seed set differs in relation to pollen and nectar foraging flower visitors in an insect-pollinated herb, 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00348.x
  56. Buchmann SL (1983) Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In: Jones CE, Little RJ, editors. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. 73–113.
  57. TH Roulston, Ecol Monogr, 70, 617 (2000)
  58. Raine Nigel E., Chittka Lars, Pollen foraging: learning a complex motor skill by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), 10.1007/s00114-006-0184-0
  59. RASHEED SALMAN, HARDER LAWRENCE, Economic motivation for plant species preferences of pollen-collecting bumble bees, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.t01-1-00059.x
  60. NE Raine, Entomologia Generalis, 29, 179 (2007)
  61. Goulson Dave, Darvill Ben, Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees; are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers?, 10.1051/apido:2003062
  62. Carvell Claire, Westrich Paul, Meek William R., Pywell Richard F., Nowakowski Marek, Assessing the value of annual and perennial forage mixtures for bumblebees by direct observation and pollen analysis, 10.1051/apido:2006002
  63. Fontaine Colin, Collin Carine L., Dajoz Isabelle, Generalist foraging of pollinators: diet expansion at high density : Flexibility of pollinator generalization, 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01405.x
  64. Brédat E (2010) Conservation des interactions entre Vaccinium uliginosum L. et ses visiteurs [Master thesis]. Mons, Belgium: University of Mons.
  65. Waser Nickolas M., Flower Constancy: Definition, Cause, and Measurement, 10.1086/284507
  66. Kunin William, Iwasa Yoh, Pollinator Foraging Strategies in Mixed Floral Arrays: Density Effects and Floral Constancy, 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0013
  67. Albert T, Raspé O, Jacquemart A -L, Diversity and spatial structure of clones in Vaccinium uliginosum populations, 10.1139/b04-164
  68. A-L Jacquemart, Belg J Bot, 136, 154 (2003)
  69. A-L Jacquemart, Bot, 74, 210 (1996)
  70. Ellstrand Norman C., Elam Diane R., Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size: Implications for Plant Conservation, 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245
Bibliographic reference Mayer, Carolin ; Michez, Denis ; Chyzy, Alban ; Brédat, Elise ; Jacquemart, Anne-Laure. The abundance and pollen foraging behaviour of bumble bees in relation to population size of whortleberry (vaccinium uliginosum). In: PLoS One, Vol. 7, no. 11, p. e50353 (2012)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/119056