|
|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
北方言語研究 = Northern Language Studies >
第13号 >
ツングース諸語の地理的分布による目的形式とその用法の相違
| Title: | ツングース諸語の地理的分布による目的形式とその用法の相違 |
| Other Titles: | Distinctions of Purposive Forms and their Functions in Tungusic on the Basis of its Geographical Distribution |
| Authors: | 白, 尚燁1 Browse this author |
| Authors(alt): | BAEK, Sangyub1 |
| Keywords: | Tungusic | | purposive elements | | intentionality | | future imperative | | ツングース諸語 | | 地理的分布 | | 目的形式 | | 意志表現 | | 遠未来命令 | | geographical distribution |
| Issue Date: | 20-Mar-2023 |
| Publisher: | 日本北方言語学会 |
| Journal Title: | 北方言語研究 |
| Journal Title(alt): | Northern Language Studies |
| Volume: | 13 |
| Start Page: | 119 |
| End Page: | 141 |
| CiNii Research CRID: | 1050295956120194048 |
| Abstract: | Taking four grammatical functions of purposive forms (i. motion purposive, ii. general purposive, iii. intentionality and iv. imperative) into account, this paper aims to concentrate on distinctions of purposive forms and their functions among Tungusic in accordance with its geographical distribution. Converb in *-mi is confirmed to function as a motion purposive marker in all Tungusic languages, but, in Manchu and Sibe, both motion purposive and general purposive can be marked by the converbal ending -m(ə). Tungusic in Russia commonly possesses specific purposive converbs, whereas such purposive converbal endings do not exist in Solon, Manchu, Sibe on the Chinese side. In addition, it deserves to mention that there is a difference in the forms of purposive converbs between North Tungusic (Evenki, Even, Negidal) and East Tungusic (Nanay, Orochi, Udihe, Uilta). Specifically, North Tungusic (Evenki, Even, Negidal) commonly retains purposive converbal ending -dAA-PERS. It not only combines with DO verbs to denote intentionality but also functions as future imperative. In East Tungusic languages (Nanay, Orochi, Udihe, Uilta), different type of purposive converbs not corresponding with -dAA-PERS in the 1st group of Tungusic on the Russian side but related to designative case are existent. They also combine with DO verbs to express intentionality in Nanay, Udihe and Uilta but do not serve as future imperative forms in the entire East Tungusic languages. Lastly, South Tungusic (Solon, Manchu, Sibe), spoken on Chinese territories, do not have purposive converbs verified in North and East Tungusic languages and, instead, purposive postposition is used to express motion and non-motion purposive. It does not serve as an element of intentionality and imperative. In terms of intentionality, they have in common that a speech verb is used in the expression. In conclusion, this study raises a possibility that areal factor is attributed to variations of purposive elements and their functions in the Tungusic languages. |
| Type: | bulletin (article) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/89070 |
| Appears in Collections: | 北方言語研究 = Northern Language Studies > 第13号
|
|
