Assessing the relative validity of the Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ for measuring dietary intake in adults

View/Open
Supplement_4.docx (90.42Kb)
Supplement_1.docx (15.14Kb)
Title_Page_22.7.16.docx (15.85Kb)
Figure_1_22.7.16.docx (173.0Kb)
Supplement_2.docx (18.84Kb)
FFQ_validation_paper_22.7.16_resubmission.docx (80.89Kb)
Supplement_3.docx (24.29Kb)
Supplement_5.docx (18.22Kb)
Publication date
01/02/2017
Author
Keywords
FFQ
Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Hollis , J L , Craig , L CA , Whybrow , S , Clark , H , Kyle , J AM & McNeill , G 2017 , ' Assessing the relative validity of the Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ for measuring dietary intake in adults ' , Public Health Nutrition , vol. 20 , no. 3 , pp. 449-455 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016002421
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-publication
Public Health Nutrition
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016002421
ISSN
1368-9800
Type
Journal article
Description
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Jacqueline Burr and Lindsey Shaw for collecting the data for this study. Data coding and entry for the food diaries was completed by Dr Lindsey Masson. The authors would also like to acknowledge the Scottish Health Survey Team, the Scottish Government and the National Centre for Social Research for their support in conducting this research. Financial support: This work was supported by funding from the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) programme of the Scottish Government (J.L.H., L.C.A.C., S.W. and G.Mc.N.). The RESAS programme had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: J.L.H., L.C.A.C., S.W. and G.Mc.N. were responsible for the design of the study and formulated the research question. L.C.A.C. and S.W. carried out the study. J.L.H. completed the literature review, conducted the statistical analysis and drafted the initial paper. All authors were responsible for drafting and revising the manuscript and have approved the final version. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Rowett Human Studies Ethical Review Panel. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Collections
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2164/7489