Comparative study of the glistening between four intraocular lens models assessed by OCT and deep learning

Bibliographic citation

Fernández-Vigo, José Ignacio; Macarro-Merino, Ana; De Moura-Ramos, Jose Joaquim; Alvarez-Rodriguez, Lorena; Burgos-Blasco, Barbara; Novo-Bujan, Jorge; Ortega-Hortas, Marcos; Fernández-Vigo, José Ángel. Comparative study of the glistening between four intraocular lens models assessed by OCT and deep learning. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 50(1):p 37-42, January 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001316

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the glistening in 4 different models of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and deep learning (DL). Setting: Centro Internacional de Oftalmología Avanzada (Madrid, Spain). Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: 325 eyes were assessed for the presence and severity of glistening in 4 IOL models: ReSTOR+3 SN6AD1 (n = 41), SN60WF (n = 110), PanOptix TFNT (n = 128) and Vivity DFT015 (n = 46). The presence of glistening was analyzed using OCT, identifying the presence of hyperreflective foci (HRF) in the central area of the IOL. A manual and an original DL-based quantification algorithm designed for this purpose was applied. Results: Glistening was detected in 22 (53.7%) ReSTOR SN6AD1, 44 (40%) SN60WF, 49 (38.3%) PanOptix TFNT, and 4 (8.7%) Vivity DFT015 IOLs, when any grade was considered. In the comparison of the different types of IOLs, global glistening measured as total HRF was 17.3 ± 25.9 for the ReSTOR+3; 9.3 ± 15.7 for the SN60WF; 6.9 ± 10.5 for the PanOptix; and 1.2 ± 2.6 for the Vivity (P < .05). There was excellent agreement between manual and DL-based quantification (≥0.829). Conclusions: It is possible to quantify, classify and compare the glistening severity in different IOL models using OCT images in a simple and objective manner with a DL algorithm. In the comparative study, the Vivity presented the lowest severity of glistening.

Description

Rights

Copyright © 2024, Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS