Comparative analysis of the role of sub-national parliaments in international human rights law in Nigeria and South Africa

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Pretoria

Abstract

Foreign policy has generally speaking been the traditional ‘responsibility of national governments’. This is particularly true of states with unitary systems of governments but is less true in federalist states.Federalist states are states which have adopted a system of government whereby ‘powers are divided and shared between constituent governments and a general government having certain nation-wide’ responsibilities’. Federalism is often adopted by pluralistic societies to ensure a system of uniformity while accommodating differences and to maintain national security and economic unity. By their nature, federalist states share responsibilities and powers between the central and constituent units.

Description

Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2010.
A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Law University of Pretoria, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Law (LLM in Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa). Prepared under the supervision of Prof. Nico Steytler, Faculty of Law, University of Western Cape, South Africa. 2010

Keywords

UCTD, Foreign policies, Pluralistic societies, Federalism

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

*
Yemisi, OA 2010, 'Comparative analysis of the role of sub-national parliaments in international human rights law in Nigeria and South Africa', University of Pretoria, Faculty of Law, Centre of Human Rights.